A signboard looks like the simplest thing a business does. It is a sheet of metal with a name on it, the sign-maker quotes a figure, and within a week it is up. Then one morning it is not, and the conversation that follows reveals that the board was never one decision at all. It was four, and nobody separated them. There is permission for the display — the municipal side, the one people vaguely know exists. There is consent for the surface, because the wall, the parapet, the terrace or the glass front belongs to somebody: a landlord, a housing society, a market association, a mall, a co-owner. That consent is contractual rather than administrative and no municipal permission substitutes for it. There is the question of the space the board hangs over, because the moment anything projects past your building line it is above ground that is not yours and a different department has a view about it. And there is the entirely separate question of what the board says — a name board identifying your premises and a display promoting somebody else’s product are different things, charged differently and permitted differently, which is how a business that was certain it was exempt discovers it is not. Two more facts decide most of the outcomes. The permission is usually periodic, not permanent, the fee recurs, nobody sends a reminder, and a lapsed permission is the single commonest reason a perfectly legal board is treated as an unauthorised one during a clearance drive. And the cost of getting this wrong is almost never the penalty people brace for — it is the board coming down, at the worst possible moment, with a retrieval charge, a refabrication bill and a stretch of trading with a blank frontage. All of which is avoidable for a fraction of the price, at one specific moment: before the board is made, not after.
Set them out side by side once and the rest of this page is mostly detail.
| The permission | Who gives it | What it does not cover |
|---|---|---|
| For the display | The municipal or advertisement authority for the area | Anything to do with who owns the wall |
| For the surface | The owner — landlord, society, market body, mall, co-owners | Does not make an unpermitted display lawful |
| For the space it projects over | Whoever controls that public space | Does not arise at all if nothing projects |
| For what it says | Depends — the authority, and sometimes a professional regulator | Nothing about size, fixing or safety |
Almost every failure described on this page is somebody who satisfied one or two of these rows and assumed the others came with them.
Because the board arrives as a single purchase. You talk to one person, the sign-maker, who quotes one figure for one object, and the object goes up in one afternoon. Everything about the transaction suggests it is one decision.
It is also because the four are invisible in different ways. The municipal permission is invisible until a drive. The surface consent is invisible until a landlord or a society objects. The projection is invisible until somebody measures. And the question of what the board says is invisible until somebody points out that the brand on the left-hand third of it is not yours.
The fix is not complicated and it is not expensive. It is asking four questions in an hour, before anything is ordered, and writing the answers down.
There is a fifth reason, and it is structural rather than careless. The four permissions are enforced at four different moments. The municipal one bites during a drive, which may be years later. The surface consent bites when a landlord changes or a society gets a new committee. The projection question bites when somebody complains about the footpath. And the content question bites when a supplier relationship ends and the board still carries their logo. Because the four never arrive together, nobody ever experiences this as one problem — which is exactly why it keeps being treated as one permission.
This is the layer people half know about: the municipal body regulates displays in public view, and the rules deal with size relative to the frontage, projection, illumination, materials and the kind of road the display faces. Our trade licence guide introduces that side, and this page does not repeat it.
What is worth adding here is the shape of the exercise rather than the rules themselves. It is an application with drawings, decided against local norms that differ from city to city, and usually for a fixed period rather than for ever. That last point is dealt with in its own section below because it is the one with the longest tail.
Because the norms are local, this page prints no sizes, no fees and no categories by name. A figure read on the internet and applied to a different city is how a board gets designed to the wrong limit, and the sign-maker will not catch it because he is working to what you told him.
Here is the layer that is almost never discussed and causes a surprising share of the trouble. Your board has to be fixed to something, and that something belongs to somebody.
If you own the premises outright and the wall is entirely yours, this layer is simple. For most shops it is not. A rented shop’s front wall belongs to the landlord. A unit in a market belongs to the owner but the common frontage may not. A shop in a society building sits inside a structure the society administers. A unit in a mall operates under a fit-out manual that controls the shopfront in detail.
Consent for the surface is a contractual question, not an administrative one. A municipal permission does not give you a right to drill into somebody else’s wall, and the owner’s agreement does not make a display lawful. They operate in different systems and you need both.
Get it in writing, specifically, before fabrication. Our landlord NOC and society NOC services prepare the consents, and our landlord NOC guide explains what a consent has to actually say to be worth having.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
This question is worth ten minutes before anybody measures anything, because the answer is frequently not what the occupier assumes.
The shop front above the shutter. Often treated as part of the shop and often not; in a multi-storey building the band above a shutter can belong to the building rather than to the unit.
The pillar or column at the edge. Frequently common, even where the shop on either side of it is private.
The parapet and the terrace. Very commonly common property, whatever the top-floor occupier believes.
The side wall facing a lane. Attractive for a board, and usually belonging to the building rather than to one unit.
The glass front. Yours to use, usually — but what is applied to it is read from the street, which brings it back to the display question.
Where the premises are rented, the honest place to settle this is the rent agreement, before anybody signs. Our rent agreement guide deals with the clauses that matter for a commercial tenant, and a line about signage costs nothing at that stage and a great deal afterwards.
A board flat against your own frontage occupies your own plane. A board that projects does something different: at some point past the building line it is above ground that belongs to the public.
That is why projecting boards, perpendicular signs, overhanging canopies with lettering, and anything on a bracket are treated more strictly almost everywhere than the flat version of the same board. It is also why the question “how far does it stick out” is asked before “how big is it”.
The practical instruction is simple. If your design projects at all, say so on the first call rather than discovering it at the drawing stage, because it changes which permission is needed and sometimes whether the design is possible at all. And if the projection exists only because the sign-maker thought it would look better, consider whether you want it enough to pay for it.
The fourth layer is about content, and it is the one that most often turns an exempt-looking board into a regulated one.
| What is on the board | How it is generally read |
|---|---|
| Your trade name and what you do | Identification of the premises — the lightest category |
| Your own products, pictured | Still yours, but moving towards promotion |
| A supplier’s brand alongside yours | Frequently treated as advertising |
| Somebody else’s product, prominently | Advertising, charged and permitted as such |
| An offer, a price or a campaign | Promotion, and often temporary-display rules apply |
The rows are not hard boundaries and local practice varies, which is exactly why the content of the board should be settled before the application rather than after. A design that quietly crosses from the first row to the third is the commonest reason a straightforward application becomes a complicated one.
A useful test, before you commit a design: cover your own name on the artwork and look at what is left. If what remains still reads as an advertisement for something — a brand, a product, an offer — then the board is doing two jobs, and the second one is the regulated one. That is not a reason to abandon the design. It is a reason to know, before filing, which category you are applying in, because applying in the wrong one and being corrected is slower than applying in the right one from the start.
It is a familiar offer and it is usually genuine: a supplier, a brand or a distributor offers to pay for your signage if their branding appears on it. The board is better than you would have bought, it costs you nothing, and everybody is pleased.
Settle three things in writing before accepting, because all three are silent in the usual arrangement and all three surface later.
Who applies for and holds the permission — you, at your premises, almost certainly; so the board is theirs and the exposure is yours.
Who pays for the permission and the renewal — the offer usually covers fabrication and stops there.
What happens if it is objected to or removed — who pays for retrieval, who pays for a compliant replacement, and whether the arrangement survives a change of design.
Also think about the end of the relationship. If you stop stocking that brand, a board carrying it is awkward for everybody and is rarely removed at the brand’s cost. Our consent letter service can put the arrangement into a short written form that protects you without making the offer complicated.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Where premises sit inside a society, a market association or a mall, there is usually a private rulebook about signage — and it is frequently stricter than anything the municipality requires.
Those rules bind you because you agreed to them, not because they have statutory force, and that is a distinction with no practical comfort in it: a body that can withhold other approvals, control access for a fitter, or act under its own bye-laws is in a strong position regardless of what the municipal position is.
So ask for the signage rules in writing before design. Malls generally have a fit-out manual that answers everything in detail. Societies and market associations often have something less formal, which is precisely why getting it in writing matters — an oral permission from one office-bearer is worth very little a year later. Our society NOC guide deals with how such bodies decide and what to ask for.
“The landlord is fine with it” is the most common answer to this question and the least useful, because it covers a conversation rather than a permission.
A consent worth having names the premises, describes the board in enough detail to identify it, states that fixing to the specified surface is permitted, and says what happens at the end of the tenancy — whether the board is removed, who makes good the surface, and at whose cost.
Those few lines prevent two familiar arguments: a landlord who later says he agreed to something smaller, and a dispute at hand-over about holes in a wall. Our landlord NOC service drafts it, and the same points belong in the lease itself where the lease is still being negotiated.
A lit board is not simply a board with a light in it. Almost everywhere it sits in a different regulatory category, for three reasons that have nothing to do with advertising.
Electrical work. There is now a supply, a fixing and a fitting on an external surface, which raises safety questions an unlit board does not.
Hours. Some areas restrict when an illuminated display may be on, particularly where residences are near.
Glare onto a road. Brightness and direction become relevant where the display faces moving traffic.
The practical point is to decide about illumination at the design stage rather than adding it later. A board approved unlit and then lit is, in effect, a new display — and it is the version most likely to attract a complaint from a neighbour, which is a different and more persistent problem than an inspection.
A screen, a scrolling message, a video wall or anything that changes is a further category again, and it is treated more carefully everywhere for an obvious reason: movement attracts attention, and attention near a road is a safety question rather than an aesthetic one.
Expect more scrutiny, expect conditions — about brightness, about rate of change, about what may be displayed — and expect the permission to be narrower than for a static board. Also expect the content rules to bite harder, because a screen that can show anything is, by definition, capable of showing an advertisement.
If a digital display is part of your plan, raise it at the very first conversation. It is the one element that most often turns out to be impossible at the particular location, and finding that out before the fit-out budget is committed is worth a great deal.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
A board on a terrace or a parapet is attractive because it is visible from a distance, and it is the version most likely to be both unpermitted and not yours to put up.
Two separate obstacles sit there. The terrace is very often common property, whatever the top-floor occupier believes and whatever the previous owner may have said; so the consent needed is the building’s rather than one unit’s. And a display at that height is generally regulated more strictly, because it is visible across a wider area and because anything fixed high up raises a different safety question.
Before measuring anything, establish ownership of the terrace from the documents rather than from practice. A terrace that one shop has used for years is not thereby that shop’s, and a board is a far more visible assertion of a claim than a water tank is.
This one catches careful people. A vinyl, a frosted logo or a printed film applied to the inside of a glass shopfront feels like interior decoration, and it is read from the street as a display.
Where the concern of the rules is with what is visible in public view, the side of the glass the material sits on is not the test. That does not mean every sticker needs an application; it means the glass front should be thought about in the same conversation as the board rather than treated as free.
The same logic applies to anything placed behind glass but facing out — a backlit panel, a standee positioned against the window, a screen pointed at the pavement. If it is designed to be read from outside, assume the outside rules are in play and ask.
An opening, a sale, a festival offer — and suddenly there is a banner across the frontage, an arch at the entrance and two standees on the footpath.
Temporary is a recognised category rather than an exemption. There is usually a way to do it properly, it is usually simpler and cheaper than a permanent display, and it usually has conditions — about duration, placement and what happens at the end. The footpath element is the part to be careful with, because anything standing on it is occupying public space rather than merely overhanging it.
The sensible approach for a business that does this regularly is to ask once, early, what the local position is on temporary displays, and then work within it every time. It is a single conversation that removes a recurring risk.
Some bodies require a local-language element on a display, and where such a requirement exists it is usually about proportion — that the local language appears, and appears prominently — rather than about excluding anything else.
Because this varies and changes, ask locally rather than following a design standard from another city or a national brand manual. It is also worth asking before design rather than after, because retrofitting a second language into a finished layout rarely looks like it was planned.
If you operate in several cities, expect this to be one of the two or three things that will not be uniform across them, and build that into the brand guidelines rather than fighting it at each location.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Most of this page assumes a business that wants to be seen. Some professions are in a different position, because their own regulator restricts advertising, and the distinction between an identification plate and a promotional board is real.
For advocates the restrictions are strict and specific, and the line falls well short of what an ordinary business would consider modest. A name plate identifying a chamber is one thing; a board that advertises a practice, lists specialities or promotes services is another, and the consequences of crossing that line are professional rather than municipal. Our advocate compliance guide sets out what is and is not permitted.
Medical practitioners, chartered accountants and several other professions have their own regulators with their own positions. If you belong to one of them, the professional rule is the first question and the municipal one is the second — not the other way round.
Everything on this page costs very little at one particular moment and a great deal at every other: before the board is fabricated.
At that point a change is a line in a drawing. The design can be made smaller, the projection removed, the illumination dropped, the brand element reduced, the language added — all at the cost of an afternoon. The same changes after fabrication mean a second board, and after installation they mean a second board plus a second installation.
So the sequence that saves the money is: establish who owns the surface, obtain the house rules in writing, find out the local norms, design within all three, submit, and then order the board.
The sequence that costs it is the one almost everybody follows: design, order, install, and find out.
Designers and sign-makers work to the brief they are given. If the brief does not contain the constraints, the design will not reflect them, and nobody in that chain is at fault.
So give the brief the constraints. The frontage dimensions, the maximum size permitted locally, whether projection is possible, whether illumination is possible, what the society or mall requires, any language element, and whether a third-party brand is going on it. Six lines at the start of a brief, and the design comes back buildable.
Where a design has already been made without them, it is worth checking it against the constraints before ordering rather than hoping. We do that check as part of this work, and it is the cheapest part of it.
A good sign-maker knows materials, fabrication, fixing and what will survive a monsoon. That is genuine expertise and it is worth paying for.
What he does not generally know is whether your particular premises, in your particular building, under your particular society’s rules, may carry the board he is quoting for. He will tell you what is usually done in the area, which is useful information and is not a permission.
Treat the two as separate purchases and the relationship works well: he builds what is approved, and somebody else establishes what may be approved. The version that goes wrong is the one where a sign-maker is asked a legal question and answers it helpfully.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
The application itself is usually short. What makes it succeed or stall is what accompanies it.
Proof of the premises — ownership or tenancy, in a form the body accepts.
Consent for the surface, where the surface is not yours.
Drawings, to a scale, showing the board in position with dimensions and projection.
Photographs of the existing frontage, which are often more persuasive than the drawings.
The trade licence or registration for the business, where the body asks for it.
Details of illumination, where applicable, including how it is powered.
Where certified copies are required rather than plain ones, our certified true copy service prepares them, and our certified copy guide explains which form different offices accept.
This is the most common reason an application sits. A drawing that shows the board in isolation, without the frontage around it, does not let anybody assess the thing that matters: the board relative to the building.
What works is a simple elevation showing the whole frontage with the board in position, dimensioned, with the projection marked where there is one and the height from ground noted. It does not have to be beautiful. It has to be measurable.
Have it prepared from actual measurements rather than from a photograph scaled by eye. A drawing that turns out not to match the building is worse than none, because it undermines everything else in the file.
Two measurements are worth taking carefully because they are the two most often queried. The frontage width, because almost every local norm expresses the permitted board size as a relationship to it rather than as an absolute. And the height from ground level to the underside of the board, because that is what decides whether a projecting element is an obstruction. Both take a tape and five minutes, and getting them from the sign-maker’s quotation instead is how a drawing ends up describing a building that is not quite yours.
Normally the occupier of the premises, with the owner’s consent attached. There are situations where that is not available.
Where the surface is common property, the applicant may have to be the body that controls it rather than you. Where the premises are held by a company or a firm, the application has to be made in the right name with the right authority behind it. Where several units share a frontage band, a single co-ordinated application sometimes replaces individual ones.
Settle this before filing. An application in the wrong name is not corrected by explanation; it is refiled, and the time is simply spent.
Almost everybody treats this as a one-time cost, and almost everywhere it is not. Permission to display is commonly granted for a period, with a fee that recurs when the period ends.
Which means a board that was entirely lawful on the day it went up can be an unauthorised display two years later without anything about the board having changed. Nothing was done wrong. A date passed.
This is the single most common way a careful business ends up in the same position as a careless one. It is also the easiest thing on this page to prevent, which is the next section.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Assume no reminder will come. Some bodies send one, many do not, and the one that does will send it to whatever address and contact were on an application filed years ago.
So on the day the permission is received, do three things: note the expiry in whatever calendar your business actually uses, set the reminder for a comfortable period before it rather than on the day, and put the permission document somewhere findable with that date written on the folder.
Where a business has several permissions — a trade licence, a signage permission, other registrations — put them on one sheet with their dates. Our trade licence guide makes the same point about the licence cycle, and the two renewals are easier managed together than separately. Our trade licence renewal service handles that side.
Enforcement on signage is not usually a notice followed by a hearing followed by a decision. It is frequently a drive: a team works through a stretch of road and unauthorised displays come down.
Nobody is there to argue with, the board is gone when you arrive, and the cost is the sum of several things that are each individually modest — the retrieval charge, the refabrication or repair, the refitting, and the period in which your premises have no name on them.
That last item is the one businesses underestimate and the one that actually hurts, particularly for a shop that depends on passing trade. It is also the one that cannot be recovered from anybody.
There is a second-order cost too, and it is worth naming because it is invisible on any invoice. A frontage with a blank panel where the name used to be reads, to a passer-by, as a business that has closed or is in trouble. For a shop that relies on being recognised from the street, three weeks of that does more damage than the retrieval charge and the new board put together — and it is the part nobody factors in when deciding whether the permission was worth taking.
Where material is taken, there is usually a process to retrieve it, usually with a charge, and usually with a short window before removed material stops being held.
So act the same week. Find out which office holds it, what is required to claim it, and what the charge is — in writing where possible. Take proof of the premises and something establishing that the board was yours, which is a reason to have photographs of your own frontage from before.
Our application drafting service prepares the request, and the general discipline of writing to an office so that it is acted on is in our guide to writing to an office.
Where a notice has been issued rather than a board simply removed, you are in a better position than you feel, because a notice states a ground and a ground can be answered.
Get it in writing if you have only been told verbally. Read what is actually alleged — no permission, a lapsed permission, a display exceeding what was permitted, an unauthorised projection — because the answer is different in each case and three of those four are curable.
Answer it factually and promptly, attaching whatever permission or consent you hold. Our reply drafting service prepares that reply. Where a dispute is with a landlord or a society rather than with an authority, that is a different conversation and our legal notice service deals with the step before proceedings.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Every discussion of this subject reaches the same point: the shop two doors down has a board twice the size with no permission at all, and nothing has ever happened to it.
That is true and it is not a position you can rely on. Enforcement on signage is uneven by nature — it moves in drives, along particular roads, at particular times, often after a complaint. The larger and more visible display is frequently the first one taken rather than the one overlooked.
The more useful observation is that your neighbour’s position tells you nothing about yours, and that the cheapest moment to fix yours is before anybody is looking. If a complaint has already been made about your stretch of road, assume the quiet period is over.
You take over premises and there is a board up. It is tempting to treat it as an asset that comes with the shop.
Find out three things before putting your own name on it. What permission it holds, if any. In whose name that permission stands, because a permission in the previous occupier’s name is of limited use to you. And whether the structure is sound, because an old frame refaced with a new skin is somebody else’s workmanship carrying your liability.
The common and avoidable version of this is a new occupier who refaces an existing board, trades happily for a year, and then discovers that the permission lapsed under the previous occupier and nobody renewed it. Ask at hand-over, when the outgoing tenant is still reachable.
Assume the permission does not travel, in either direction, unless you establish otherwise.
At the end of a tenancy there are three questions worth having answered in the lease rather than in a disagreement: whether the board is removed, who makes good the surface where it was fixed, and what happens to the permission if the incoming occupier wants to use the same frame. Our rent agreement guide deals with the end-of-term clauses generally, and signage belongs among them.
For an outgoing tenant, there is a practical point as well: a board carrying your name left up after you have gone is a small problem that grows. Take it down or get it covered.
A business with more than one location wants a consistent frontage, and consistency is exactly what local variation defeats.
The workable approach is a design system rather than a fixed design: a defined palette, logo and typeface with permitted variations in size, proportion and language, so that each location can be brought within its own limits without the brand falling apart. Brands that insist on one exact board everywhere end up either with non-compliant boards or with locations that quietly ignore the manual.
Keep one register of every location’s permission with its renewal date, held centrally rather than by each manager. For a business with ten shops, that single sheet is worth more than any individual permission on it.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
It is worth saying plainly because it comes up constantly: a trade licence permits the activity at the premises. It says nothing about displaying anything on the outside of them.
They are frequently administered by the same municipal body, which is exactly why people assume one covers the other. They are separate applications, with separate fees, separate periods and separate renewals. Our trade licence service covers the first and our trade licence guide explains which businesses need one at all.
The same logic applies in reverse, and it is worth a sentence for the nervous: a signage permission does not authorise your trade either.
While you are asking these questions, it is efficient to ask the rest of them in the same conversation, because the answers come from overlapping offices and the documents largely overlap too.
The trade licence or registration for the activity itself.
A food licence where anything is made, served or sold to eat — a different regime again, dealt with in our trade licence guide.
An eating house permission where the premises serve food on site, which in several cities is a separate permission from the food licence — our eating house licence service covers it.
Legal metrology registration where anything is sold by weight or measure or is sold pre-packed — our weights and measures registration service deals with that.
The landlord and society consents, which this page has already made a point about.
Doing them together is cheaper and faster than doing them one at a time as each is discovered, which is the usual pattern and the expensive one.
Some locations carry restrictions that have nothing to do with your business and everything to do with where it is: conservation or heritage areas, particular markets with a prescribed uniform frontage, roads where displays are controlled for traffic reasons, and buildings or precincts with their own character rules.
In those places the usual local norms may be replaced entirely by something stricter, and a board that would be unremarkable a street away is simply not permitted. This is not a situation to discover after fabrication.
The way to find out is to ask before you design, and to ask specifically whether the location is subject to anything beyond the ordinary rules. It is a question most offices answer readily, and it is the one nobody thinks to put.
Separate from every permission on this page is a question nobody regulates into you: is the thing securely fixed, and will it stay fixed.
A board is a large flat object on an external wall, exposed to wind, rain and years. Fixings corrode, frames fatigue, and the failure mode of a badly fixed board is a sheet of metal falling onto a pavement. That is a liability question of a completely different order from an unpermitted display.
So specify the fixing, not just the face. Ask what the frame is, how it is anchored, and what the maintenance expectation is. And look at it once a year, particularly after a monsoon, particularly if it is lit, and particularly if it is high up.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Small, and it answers every question that is ever asked about a board.
The permission, with its period and expiry noted on the outside of the folder.
The application and the drawings as submitted — what was approved is what was applied for.
The landlord or society consent.
Photographs of the frontage after installation, dated. These are what establish what your board was if it is ever removed.
The sign-maker’s invoice and specification, which also serves as proof of value.
Any correspondence with the authority, the society or the landlord about the board.
The renewal record, each time.
Scan it once. The photographs in particular are worth taking on the day, because nobody takes a picture of their own shopfront until they need one.
Almost every call on this subject comes after the event, and the causes repeat.
The permission lapsed. Nothing about the board changed and nobody was reminded.
It was never taken. Because the sign-maker said it was not needed in that market.
The board grew. Approved at one size, replaced later with a bigger one, and the permission was never varied.
Illumination was added afterwards. Effectively a new display, on an old permission.
A brand element appeared. A supplier’s logo was added and the board changed category.
It projected. A bracket was added for visibility, taking the board over public space.
The society objected, not the municipality, and the house rules turned out to be stricter.
A complaint was made. By a neighbour, about glare or obstruction, which is the version that does not go away on its own.
Photographs are fine and incomplete is fine — we will tell you what is actually missing.
Photographs of the frontage as it is today, straight on, with enough of the building around it to show the context.
The premises documents — ownership or the rent agreement.
The design, if one exists, with dimensions; or the sign-maker’s quotation, which usually carries them.
Whether it projects, and whether it will be lit. These two answers change the whole exercise.
Whose brand is on it besides your own.
Any society, market or mall rules you have been given.
Any notice already received, or details of a removal if one has happened.
We start by working out which of the four permissions your particular board actually touches, because that decides everything else and it takes one conversation rather than a study.
We establish who owns the surface from the documents rather than from assumption, and draft or obtain the consents that go with it — the landlord NOC, the society or market consent, and a short written understanding where a brand is paying for the board.
We prepare the application with the drawings and photographs in the form the body wants to see, tell you plainly when something you have designed will not be approved as drawn, file it and follow it up. Where a notice has been received or a board removed, we prepare the reply or the retrieval request instead.
And at the end you get the folder described above, with the renewal date noted and a reminder set — which is the single cheapest thing in this entire piece of work and the one that prevents the commonest failure.
Place Order — Free · pay after work
Fabrication, fitting, electrical work and structural fixing are your sign-maker’s and your electrician’s, and we neither do them nor take anything from that side. We are quite happy to give the fabricator the approved drawing and the constraints directly, which is usually the smoothest arrangement.
And where this stops being documentation altogether — a dispute with a landlord or a society that will not be resolved by correspondence, a proceeding about a removal, or a claim arising from a board that fell — that is a matter for an advocate, and it is better taken up at the start than after three months of letters.
Finding one costs nothing here. The listing we maintain takes no fee from you and none from the advocate either; a single enquiry lands with everybody practising in that area together, the first with room for it writes back, and your contact details stay out of sight until that point.
Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly; we do not quote, collect or share it.
We will not tell you that a board does not need permission in order to win the work. Where the honest answer is that your design will not be approved as drawn, that is the answer you will get.
We will not prepare a drawing or a measurement that does not match the board you intend to put up, in either direction.
We will not describe a display as something it is not — a branded advertisement as a name board, or a lit display as unlit — in an application or anywhere else.
We will not draft a consent for a surface from somebody who does not have the authority to give it, or help present one person’s permission as another’s.
We will not alter, retouch or recreate a permission, a receipt or a notice, in any form.
We will not promise that a permission will be granted. We will tell you what is usually approved in that kind of location and where we think your design sits relative to it.
Our part begins at ₹3,999 and runs to 15 – 45 days for a single location. The figure is told to you in full before anything is filed, and nothing is payable in advance. Where the consents are already in hand and only the application is needed, it is quoted below that; where several branches are done together, it is quoted as one piece of work.
Whatever the authority charges for the permission, and whatever it charges again at renewal, is its own charge and reaches you as its own figure. The board itself — design, fabrication, fitting and the electrical work — is your sign-maker’s, and nothing from that side comes to us.
What makes one of these expensive is almost never the application. It is a board that was made before anybody asked, a consent that had to be obtained from a body that meets once a month, or a removal that had already happened by the time we were called — and the first of those three is the one entirely within your control.
And the part that costs nothing, which is where most of the value on this page sits: split the one question into four before you order anything, find out who owns the surface from the documents rather than from habit, get the society or market rules in writing before design, say out loud at the first conversation whether the board projects and whether it will be lit, settle in writing who holds and pays for the permission if a brand is funding the board, photograph your own frontage on the day it goes up — and write the renewal date somewhere you will actually see it, because nobody else is going to.
A signboard is not one permission. It is permission for the display, consent from whoever owns the wall, a separate question about anything that projects over public ground, and a fourth about what the board actually says — and the fee for the first one usually comes back every few years without a reminder. We work out which of the four your board touches, establish who owns the surface from the documents, draft the landlord and society consents, prepare the application with drawings in the form the office wants, tell you honestly when a design will not be approved as drawn, and hand you a folder with the renewal date already noted. Where a notice has arrived or a board has already come down, we prepare the reply or the retrieval request instead. Send photographs of the frontage along with whatever design exists — we charge nothing for working out where you stand, and no money changes hands before the work is done.
Two doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
Would rather not pick anybody? Tell us the matter instead — one form goes to every advocate at once, and the first to take it up calls you.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates