Most people in this region say “Delhi NCR” as though it were one place. For a bus route it nearly is. For a dispute it is not, and the gap between those two facts costs people months. Gurugram is in Haryana. That single line on a map decides which High Court hears your appeal, which police force takes your complaint, which rent statute governs your tenancy, which regulator hears your builder complaint, and what you pay at the filing counter. It does not decide who may argue for you — and that is the part everybody gets backwards.
The National Capital Region is a planning idea. It was built to coordinate roads, water, transport and land use across a ring of districts that had grown into one another. It works well for that. It was never a legal boundary, and nothing about it was designed to tell you where a dispute is heard.
For ordinary life the distinction is invisible. People live in Dwarka and work in Cyber City, their children go to school in one state and their parents live in another, and they move between all of it on the same metro card. So when something goes wrong — a builder stops answering, a tenant stops paying, a job ends badly, a car is hit — the instinct is to treat the whole region as one place and start by asking which lawyer in Delhi to call.
That instinct is where the months go. Inside the ring there are four separate legal systems. Delhi is Delhi. Gurugram and Faridabad are Haryana. Noida and Ghaziabad are Uttar Pradesh. Each has its own High Court, its own police force, its own state amendments to central statutes, and in some areas — rent is the clearest example — an entirely different Act. Two neighbours with identical problems can end up in different buildings, before different courts, under different statutes, with different fees, because of which side of a road they signed on.
Uttar Pradesh is a world of its own again, and in Noida it is not only the statutes that differ: the land under most of the city is leased from a development authority rather than sold, which produces a whole category of dispute Gurugram simply does not have. That one is on our Noida page.
Faridabad is Haryana too, so everything on this page applies there without change. What it has more of than Gurugram is colonies laid out and sold without a licence under the 1975 Act — and the difference between a colony being taken up for amenities and your own title being sound is set out on our Faridabad page.
This page is about one of those four: Gurugram. It is written for the person who lives in the region and has suddenly discovered that their matter is in Haryana, and who wants to know what that actually means before spending anything.
The question is never “who is a good lawyer in NCR”. It is “which state’s forum does my matter belong to”, and only after that, who should appear in it. Answering them in that order is the whole of this page.
It helps to see the list before the explanations, because the list is shorter than people fear and the explanations are longer than they expect. Five things change and one famously does not.
| What | In Delhi | In Gurugram |
|---|---|---|
| The High Court above your matter | Delhi High Court | Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh |
| The police force | Delhi Police | Haryana Police — Gurugram is a police commissionerate |
| The rent statute | Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 | Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 |
| The real estate regulator | Delhi’s authority | HARERA, the Gurugram authority, with its own jurisdiction |
| Court fees and stamp duty | Set under Delhi’s amendments | Set under Haryana’s amendments |
| Who may argue for you | No change. An advocate on any State roll may appear anywhere in India | |
| Limitation — the time you have | No change. The Limitation Act, 1963 is central law | |
Everything below is one row of that table, opened up.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has authority over Punjab, Haryana and the Union Territory of Chandigarh, and it sits at Chandigarh. Every appeal, every revision and every writ petition arising out of the Gurugram district judiciary goes there. Not to the Delhi High Court, which is forty minutes away. To Chandigarh, which is not.
People find this hard to believe the first time they hear it, and the disbelief is understandable: the Delhi High Court is nearer to a Gurugram litigant than it is to a litigant in parts of Delhi. Distance has nothing to do with it. A High Court’s authority runs over a territory, and Haryana is not in the Delhi High Court’s territory.
Two practical consequences follow, and both of them are better understood at the beginning of a matter than at the end of one.
None of this is a reason for alarm. It is a reason to ask one question early: if this matter has to go up, who takes it up and from where? An advocate who answers that question plainly on the first call is telling you something useful about how they work.
This is the most common worry on this page and it has a clean answer. Yes. The statute is explicit, and it is worth reading in its own words rather than in anybody’s summary of them. Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides:
“Subject to the provisions of this Act, every advocate whose name is entered in the State roll shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this Act extends —
(i) in all courts including the Supreme Court;
(ii) before any tribunal or person legally authorised to take evidence; and
(iii) before any other authority or person before whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practise.”
Advocates Act, 1961, Section 30Read it slowly, because every phrase in it is doing work. “Entitled as of right” — not permitted, not on application, not subject to local approval. “Throughout the territories to which this Act extends” — the whole country, not the state of enrolment. “In all courts including the Supreme Court” — which settles the point for every court between a Gurugram magistrate and the top.
So an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi may appear in Gurugram, and an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana may appear in Delhi. The roll decides where the name is written, not where the advocate may stand. Anybody who tells you otherwise — and it is usually said to sell you a referral — is wrong, and you can now say why.
Two different things get mixed up. The first is the right to practise, which Section 30 settles. The second is local rules and practice in particular courts and tribunals, which can require or encourage engaging somebody on record locally in some settings. Those are administrative arrangements about how a matter is conducted; they are not a bar on who may appear, and they vary. If somebody tells you a rule applies to your matter, ask them which rule, and ask them to show it to you.
Having said the law plainly, it would be dishonest to leave the impression that the question is therefore unimportant. Most people with a Gurugram matter do end up engaging somebody who works in Gurugram, and the reasons are good ones. They are just not legal reasons.
| Reason | What it actually means for you |
|---|---|
| Dates are frequent and short | A great deal of district court work is a five-minute appearance. Somebody already in the building does it without a half day lost in traffic, and bills accordingly. |
| The registry is a place, not a website | Filing, objections, certified copies, inspection of the file — these are counter-level tasks where knowing the counter saves days. |
| Local case law and local practice | The binding High Court is Chandigarh, and somebody practising in Haryana reads that court first by habit. |
| Urgency | When something has to be moved the same day, proximity is the whole of the advantage. |
And the arrangement people most often end up with is not a choice between the two at all. It is both: the advocate who knows the matter, and somebody local who appears on routine dates. Where that is how it is going to work, settle it openly at the start — who appears on what, who speaks to you after each date, and how the fee is split. The arrangements that go wrong are the ones nobody said out loud.
Gurugram’s district courts moved. If you are working from an old summons, an old address or an old memory of where the court is, that information is out of date, and this is the one section on this page with a shelf life.
The new district court complex, known as the Tower of Justice, was inaugurated on 12 July 2026 by the Chief Justice of India. It is spread over roughly seven acres, and reports describe it as the largest judicial complex in north India. The number of courtrooms is reported as about 55, up from around 45 in the old premises — though published figures differ slightly, which is itself a reason to check your own room from the cause list rather than from any description, including this one. Alongside the courtrooms, reports describe a bank and post office, a bar library, a mediation centre, video-conferencing facilities, a judicial record room, a ladies’ bar room with a childcare centre, and a planned international arbitration centre under the High Court.
The move did not happen calmly. The complex had been years in the making, with an original completion target long past. In May 2026 a fire broke out in the record room of the old District and Sessions Court complex, which had served the city for about five decades. A large number of court records were damaged, part of the building was reported as structurally unfit for use, and around 21 courts were shifted temporarily to the PWD Rest House — which is how a major district judiciary came to be working out of a government guest house.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court took the matter in hand: it had already been pressing the state over the delay, and in July 2026 a bench permitted the shift into the new complex even though some clearances were still pending, describing the move as inevitable in the predominant public interest, and requiring a compliance affidavit from the state.
We have deliberately not printed a sector number or a street address on this page. We could not verify one from a source we would be willing to stand behind, and sending somebody to the wrong gate on a hearing morning is worse than sending them to ask.
For most readers this will not apply. For some it will, and for them it is the most important section here, because the instinct in this situation is to wait and see, and waiting is the one thing that makes it worse.
A fire in a record room damages the court’s copy. It does not damage yours. That asymmetry is the whole of the opportunity: where a document on the court file is lost or damaged, reconstruction is possible, and reconstruction runs on the copies the parties still hold. The person who kept a complete set is suddenly the person who controls how quickly their own case recovers.
And the lesson generalises, which is why it sits on a page that most readers will reach for other reasons: your own file is not a copy of the court’s file. It is a second original. Keep it that way, in one place, for as long as the matter can possibly come back.
“The Gurugram court” is not one thing any more than any district judiciary is. What exists is a set of forums, and the first useful act in any matter is to name the right one. Here is the map, in the order people usually need it.
| If your matter is about | It belongs to |
|---|---|
| Money owed, a contract, property, a declaration, an injunction | The civil courts — Civil Judge or District Judge depending on what is at stake |
| An offence, an FIR, a trial, bail | The magistrate and sessions courts |
| Divorce, maintenance, custody, guardianship, a declaration about a marriage | The Family Court at Gurugram |
| A defective product, a deficient service, a rejected claim | The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission |
| A builder, a delayed flat, a registered project | HARERA — the Gurugram authority |
| An industrial dispute, a termination where you are a workman | The labour courts at Gurugram |
| A tenancy the 1973 Act applies to | The Rent Controller |
| A road accident and compensation | The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal |
| Anything against a Haryana authority, or an appeal from the above | The Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh |
Two of those rows are where Gurugram genuinely differs from Delhi rather than merely sitting in a different building — rent and real estate — and they get their own sections below. The rest run on the same central statutes you would meet anywhere, which is why this page links to the guides that already explain them rather than writing them again.
Here is the question that produces more wasted money than any other in this region: can I file in Delhi instead, because it is nearer?
Only if a Delhi court actually has jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is not a preference you exercise; it is a fact about your dispute. It comes from where the thing happened, where the property is, where the other side lives or works, and sometimes from what the contract says. It does not come from where you live, how far you can travel, or which city your lawyer prefers.
Filing in a court without jurisdiction is not a small error you can correct later without cost. The objection can be taken at any stage, often is taken late, and the fee, the months and sometimes the limitation period are gone with it. The half hour spent answering those four questions before filing is the cheapest half hour in the whole matter.
Which court has jurisdiction over your dispute depends on facts only you have — the agreement, where things actually happened, who the other side really is. No page, including this one, can answer it for you, and anybody who answers it confidently without reading your papers is guessing with your money.
Almost every printed agreement in this region — a builder-buyer agreement, a lease, an employment contract, a vendor agreement — carries a line saying that disputes shall be subject to the jurisdiction of courts at some named place. In Gurugram transactions that place is usually Gurugram, and sometimes it is Delhi, and occasionally it is somewhere nobody in the transaction has ever been.
The principle to hold on to is short. A jurisdiction clause can choose between courts that each already have jurisdiction. It cannot create jurisdiction in a court that has none. So where two courts could properly hear the matter, a clause naming one of them is usually given effect. Where the clause names a court that has no connection with the dispute at all, it does not magically acquire one.
Which of those two situations you are in is a question of fact about your own transaction, and it is worth putting to an advocate before filing rather than discovering through an application. If your agreement is a flat purchase, our builder-buyer agreement guide deals with what the document itself should and should not contain; if it is a tenancy, the lease agreement page does the same.
If your matter is criminal, the force you are dealing with is Haryana Police, not Delhi Police. Gurugram is one of Haryana’s police commissionerates — along with Faridabad and Panchkula — which means it is headed by a Commissioner of Police rather than run on the older district pattern, with the hierarchy and the powers that go with the commissionerate system.
For you, the practical content of that is small but real. The station is a Haryana station. The officer above the station house officer is in a Haryana chain of command. A complaint to a senior officer goes up that chain, not to anybody in Delhi. And the escalation routes you may have read about for Delhi — a particular commissioner’s office, a particular helpline — are not the ones that apply.
What does not change is the statute. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is central law and applies identically in Gurugram and in Delhi.
The sequence those sections create, what to do at each refusal, and what to write down on the day, are all set out on our FIR guide. That page is written around Delhi examples, but the statute it explains is the same one that applies in Gurugram, so the steps transfer; only the station and the officer’s designation differ. If somebody has actually been taken into custody, the page you need is arrest and bail, and the first twenty-four hours there matter more than anything on this page.
Everything on this page so far has been about how the border separates things. There is one mechanism that deliberately ignores it, and it is the single most useful thing an NCR resident can know about criminal procedure.
Information about a cognizable offence must be recorded at the police station you reach, regardless of where the offence took place. The station records it and transfers the papers to the station that has territorial jurisdiction. That is what people mean by a Zero FIR — it is numbered zero at the receiving station because the real number is given where it finally lands.
So if something happened in Gurugram and you are in Delhi — or the reverse — you do not have to travel first and report second. You report, and the paper travels. This matters most in exactly the situations where travelling is hardest: at night, after an assault, after an accident, when you are with somebody who needs a hospital, when a woman has been attacked and the nearest station is not the “right” one.
This is the section where Gurugram stops being “Delhi with a different pin code” and becomes a different legal environment. Landlord and tenant in Delhi is governed by the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. In Gurugram it is the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, which applies to urban areas in Haryana, with cantonment areas outside it.
These are two different statutes. They are not two versions of the same statute. The exemptions differ, the grounds of eviction are their own list, and the first authority is the Rent Controller under the Haryana Act. A Delhi tenant and a Gurugram tenant in identical factual situations can have materially different positions, and each will be surprised by the other’s.
Rather than reproduce a statute here — our landlord and tenant guide already does that work for Delhi — this page does the thing that guide cannot: it tells you which law you are under, and where the difference actually bites.
The Haryana Act carries an exemption that is unusually consequential in a city like Gurugram. The Act does not apply to a building for ten years from the date its construction was completed.
Think about what that means in a city where an enormous share of the housing and commercial stock is new. For a very large number of Gurugram tenancies, the rent statute simply is not in the picture. The relationship is governed by the agreement the parties signed and by the general law — not by the protections and procedures a rent Act supplies.
That exemption has been tested. In Mohinder Kumar v. State of Haryana the Supreme Court upheld the ten-year exemption as constitutional, while observing that an exemption which was indefinite or unduly long could be arbitrary. So it is settled law, and it is settled against the assumption most tenants arrive with.
It is worth being precise about the comparison, because Delhi has a ten-year clause of its own and a careless page would tell you it does not. Under the Delhi Act, premises constructed after the commencement of the 1988 amending Act are exempt for ten years from completion — our Delhi guide explains it. The difference is not the existence of the clause, it is whether it is still doing anything. In Delhi that window has long since closed for buildings of that vintage, so the exemption people actually meet there is the rent threshold. In Gurugram, where a very great deal was completed in the last ten years, the ten-year clause is live, and it is live for exactly the buildings most readers of this page are renting.
If you are a tenant in Gurugram: read your agreement as though it is the law, because for a newer building it very largely is. The notice period, the lock-in, the grounds on which you can be asked to leave, the deposit and how it comes back — those are in your document, and if they are not in it, they are not anywhere.
If you are a landlord in Gurugram: the same fact cuts your way and against you. You are not inside the rent-control procedure for that period, which is an advantage; equally, you have only the agreement to rely on, so a thin agreement leaves you with thin rights.
For either of you: this is the single strongest argument for having the agreement drafted properly rather than downloaded. Ours is here, with the price on the page before you order.
| Delhi | Gurugram (Haryana) | |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Act | Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 | Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 |
| Headline exemption | Premises above a monthly rent threshold set by the Act are outside it | Buildings for ten years from completion of construction are outside it |
| Extent | Delhi | Urban areas in Haryana; cantonment areas excluded |
| First authority | Rent Controller under the Delhi Act | Rent Controller under the Haryana Act |
| Appeal route above that | Within the Delhi hierarchy, and then the Delhi High Court | Within the Haryana hierarchy, and then the Punjab and Haryana High Court |
| Where the detail is | Our Delhi guide | Ask an advocate — the grounds are their own list and the facts decide |
We have deliberately not printed a rent figure for Haryana. The Delhi Act has a well-known monetary threshold in its own text; we did not find a comparable figure in the Haryana Act, and inventing one — or copying one from another site that invented it — would be worse than silence. If your tenancy is near any boundary of the Act, that is a question for somebody who will read your documents.
Haryana did something unusual when it set up its real estate regulator. Most states created one authority. Haryana created two: one for the district of Gurugram, and one at Panchkula for the rest of the State. The regulator’s own words are plain about it — the Government decided “to set up two Real Estate Regulatory Authorities, one for the district Gurugram and another for rest of the State”.
So a Gurugram project goes to the Gurugram authority. That is not a detail of convenience; it is which body has the power to hear your complaint. A complaint filed with the wrong authority is a complaint that has to be filed again, and the months in between are months.
Two cautions. First, sixty days is short, and it runs from receipt of the copy, not from when you got round to reading it. If an order has gone against you, the clock is already running while you are deciding whether to appeal. Second, delay can be condoned, but only on sufficient cause — which means an application, an explanation and a discretion you would rather not be relying on.
We have not printed a filing fee on this page. Figures of that kind are fixed by regulation and change, and a wrong figure costs somebody a wasted trip.
A delayed or defective flat in Gurugram can, depending on the facts, be taken to more than one forum. That is not a loophole; it is a genuine choice with genuine consequences, and the choice is usually made badly because it is made quickly.
| Door | Suits you when | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| HARERA Gurugram | The project is registered and the complaint is about the obligations the Act imposes on a promoter | The regulator-specific route, with the sixty-day appeal above it |
| Consumer commission | The complaint is framed as deficiency in service to a consumer | Process and pitfalls on our consumer commission guide |
| Insolvency, where the promoter is in it | The company has gone into an insolvency process and ordinary recovery has stopped | A different world with its own clocks — see NCLT |
| Civil court | The claim is contractual and does not fit the above | Slower, but sometimes the only honest fit |
Which one is right turns on the registration status of the project, what you are actually asking for, how much of your money has moved and when, and whether the promoter is solvent. Those are facts, and they decide the answer. What this page can tell you is the part that is about Gurugram rather than about you: whichever door you choose, the project is in Haryana, and that fixes the authority, the tribunal and the High Court above them.
The Family Court at Gurugram handles the matters the Family Courts Act assigns to it — divorce, judicial separation, maintenance, custody, guardianship, declarations about the validity of a marriage — and the High Court posts a Principal Judge to it.
The law being applied is central law, so nothing about what has to be proved changes because the building is in Haryana. Our pages carry the substance: what a contested divorce actually requires you to establish and why “the marriage has broken down” is not by itself a ground before a trial court; how custody is decided on the welfare of the child rather than on a parent’s right; and where a mutual consent divorce fits when both sides agree.
What does change is where it is filed and where an appeal goes, and one practical point that comes up constantly in this region: couples very often marry in one state, live in another and separate in a third. Where the petition can be filed is then a real question, not a formality, and it is worth answering before drafting rather than after. If the marriage itself was registered in Delhi, our court marriage guide explains what that registration does and does not fix.
Gurugram is one of the largest concentrations of private-sector employment in the country. A very large number of people who live in Delhi, Noida or Faridabad work there. So when a job ends badly, the dispute is frequently a Haryana dispute even though everything about the person’s life is Delhi.
The first question is not where, it is what you are. The machinery that exists for a workman under industrial law is not the machinery that exists for a senior manager, and the forum follows the classification rather than the job title on the offer letter. Gurugram has labour courts of its own — two of them, as reported in 2025 — and that is where industrial disputes in the district are heard.
If the end of the job also involved a complaint of sexual harassment, that has its own statutory machinery and its own clocks, and the employer-side obligations are set out on our POSH page. If it involved a company whose documents you signed without reading, the HR policy and employment agreement pages explain what those documents are supposed to contain.
Registration happens where the property is. A Gurugram property is registered before the Sub-Registrar having jurisdiction over it, under the central Registration Act, and the stamp payable is governed by the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as it applies in Haryana — which is the operative phrase, because Haryana legislates for itself here.
One Haryana amendment is worth knowing about by name, because it is the one that catches people. The Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2020 deals with instruments that are valued below their proper value: it allows the Collector to examine such an instrument, with an appeal to the Commissioner above that. In plain terms — if a sale deed is written at a figure the State considers too low, the matter does not quietly end at the registration counter.
Stamp duty rates, circle or collector rates and registration charges are set by the State and revised. Printing a number here would make this page wrong within a year and expensive for whoever believed it. Take the current figure from the Sub-Registrar, or from an advocate who has checked it this month, and treat any website quoting a rate — including the confident ones — as a starting point for a question, not an answer.
The documents themselves do not change across the border even though the duty does. Our pages on the sale deed, the conveyance deed and the public notice before purchase set out what each is for. If the dispute is within a family rather than with a seller, the family property guide is the page you want, and its law is central law that applies the same way in Haryana.
Both Delhi and Haryana apply the Court Fees Act, 1870. Neither applies it unamended. Haryana amended it in 1990, and again in 2009, when the table of ad valorem rates in Schedule I was replaced in its application to Haryana.
The consequence is simple and almost never anticipated: the same suit, for the same amount, does not necessarily carry the same court fee on the two sides of the border. People who have litigated in Delhi before arrive at a Gurugram filing counter with a figure in their head and find it is the wrong figure.
We are not printing the schedules. They are statutory, they have been revised before and can be revised again, and a wrong number here becomes a rejected filing there. Ask your advocate, or ask at the filing counter, for the fee on your suit as valued.
After five sections of differences it is worth being emphatic about the thing that is identical, because people lose more to this than to any of the differences.
The Limitation Act, 1963 is central law. The period for your kind of claim is the same in Gurugram as in Delhi, it started when your cause of action arose, and it has been running ever since — including through the weeks you spent working out which state you were in.
The commonest sequence we see is this. Something goes wrong in Gurugram. The person asks around in Delhi. Somebody says it is a Haryana matter. They look for a Gurugram lawyer. Weeks pass in being referred from one person to another. By the time somebody reads the papers, a deadline that had nothing to do with any of this has moved much closer, and in some matters it has gone. Deciding takes time, and limitation does not pause while you decide. If you do nothing else after reading this page, put your matter in front of somebody this week, even to be told it is not urgent.
| From | Goes to |
|---|---|
| A civil court at Gurugram | The appellate court within the district judiciary, and above that the Punjab and Haryana High Court |
| A magistrate at Gurugram | The sessions court, and above that the Punjab and Haryana High Court |
| The Family Court at Gurugram | The Punjab and Haryana High Court |
| HARERA Gurugram | The Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal — within sixty days — and above that the High Court |
| The District Consumer Commission | The State Commission, and above that the National Commission |
| A Rent Controller | The appellate authority under the Act, and above that the High Court |
| The Punjab and Haryana High Court | The Supreme Court of India |
The pattern is worth seeing as a pattern rather than as seven rows: almost everything in Gurugram eventually converges on Chandigarh, and from there on Delhi — but as the Supreme Court, not as the Delhi High Court. That is the shape of the system you are in.
A first hearing is rarely the dramatic event people brace for. Most of what makes the day hard is logistical, and in a complex that opened in 2026 the logistics are new to everybody, including the regulars.
Two small things that are specific to a recent move. If somebody at the gate directs you somewhere that contradicts what you were told, follow the person in the building rather than the instruction in your pocket — room allocations settle over months. And if the matter is one that was disrupted during the shift, ask your advocate to confirm the next date from the record rather than from the last thing anyone remembers.
Whatever the matter, the same handful of documents decide how smoothly it moves. None of them are difficult. They are simply never assembled until they are urgently needed.
| Document | Why it keeps mattering |
|---|---|
| Affidavit | Nearly every application is supported by one, and a loose affidavit damages a good case |
| Vakalatnama | The authority your advocate files to appear for you. Keep your own signed copy; it answers questions later about who was on record and from when |
| Rent agreement | In Gurugram, for a newer building, the agreement is doing the work a rent statute does elsewhere |
| Sale deed and conveyance deed | The title documents every property matter starts from |
| Legal notice | Often the first step, and sometimes a statutory precondition |
| Employment agreement | Decides a great deal of what a Gurugram employment dispute turns on |
| Builder-buyer agreement | The document a HARERA complaint is built out of |
Each of those pages shows its own price before you order anything, and nothing is payable in advance.
Or, more often, planning on the assumption that the Delhi High Court is above a Gurugram matter. It is not. Everything above the Gurugram district judiciary is at Chandigarh. Discovering this when an appeal is due is the worst possible moment to discover it.
They can, and Section 30 says so in terms. This belief costs people the advocate who already knows their matter, usually at the point where continuity is worth the most. Engage somebody local if the practical reasons apply — but as a choice, not because somebody told you a rule that does not exist.
Different Act, different exemptions, and a ten-year exemption for new buildings that covers much of what Gurugram is made of. Advice built on the Delhi statute can be confidently wrong here, and it is given confidently every day.
Jurisdiction comes from the facts of the dispute and sometimes from the contract. It does not come from the travel time. A filing in the wrong court can be objected to late, and by then the fee and the months are spent.
This is the expensive one, and it is the one nobody counts. While you are being referred from person to person about which state you are in, the limitation period is doing what it always does. Get the papers in front of somebody early, even if the answer is that there is no rush.
Last reviewed 1 October 2026. Court buildings, fees and administrative arrangements change — the statutes on this page change far less often than the practical details do, so treat the practical details as the part to re-check.
This page is about where. It is not about what. Almost every reader arrives here with an underlying dispute that has its own page, and that page is where the answer is. Find your row.
| If your matter is about | Read |
|---|---|
| A builder, a delayed flat, a registered project | Filing a RERA complaint |
| A landlord, a tenant or vacating premises | Landlord and tenant disputes |
| Family property, a share, a partition | Family property disputes |
| Getting an FIR registered, or a refusal at the station | FIR registration — and what follows |
| Somebody has been arrested or is in custody | Arrest and bail |
| A divorce the other side will not agree to | Contested divorce |
| A child — custody, access, guardianship | Child custody |
| Money owed to you, or a suit for money against you | Recovering money owed |
| A dishonoured cheque | Section 138 — cheque bounce |
| A defective product or a deficient service | The consumer commission |
| A road accident and compensation | Motor accident claims |
| Something posted about you online | Online abuse and harassment |
| A notice or summons and you do not know what it is | A notice or summons has arrived |
| Whether you need an advocate at all | Do I actually need a lawyer |
Cost stops more people than difficulty does, and the system has an answer for that which is badly advertised. India runs a statutory legal services framework that provides representation at no charge to people in defined categories, and the categories are wider than most readers assume — they are not limited to the very poorest. The entitlement exists in Haryana exactly as it does in Delhi, and it is claimed through the legal services authority rather than through any private office. Our legal aid page sets out who qualifies and how to ask. It is worth five minutes before concluding that nothing can be done.
Two other routes are worth a sentence each. Lok Adalat settles compromisable matters by consent, and its award is final between the parties. Mediation is available through court-annexed centres — the new Gurugram complex includes one — and it is often the quickest honest exit from a family or commercial dispute that is going nowhere.
It is only fair to be exact about our own role, because a page this long could easily leave the impression that we are the ones who will argue your matter. We are not, and we are not permitted to be. Legal Space Services is a documentation and coordination company. We draft and execute papers, we get things registered and attested, we keep a file in order, and we put people in front of advocates. The advocate is a separate professional whom you engage.
In a Gurugram matter that division usually looks like this. We prepare the documents the matter needs — the agreement, the affidavit, the notice, the deed — with the price shown before you order and nothing payable in advance. We tell you, plainly, which state’s forum your matter appears to belong to and what the realistic next step is. And we put the matter in front of advocates, as one request that reaches all of them together, so that the first one free takes it up and calls you.
| We will not | Why |
|---|---|
| Tell you a particular advocate is the best one for you | There is no honest basis for it, and the Bar Council rules do not permit ranking advocates |
| Quote, collect or share an advocate’s fee | It is not ours. Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly |
| Predict what a court will do | Anybody who does is selling confidence, not analysis |
| Print a stamp duty rate, a court fee or a filing fee | They are set by the State, they are revised, and a stale figure costs you a trip |
| Draft something we think is untrue | An affidavit is a statement on oath, and a document that will not survive cross-examination is worse than no document |
There is one more, and it is the reason this page says “we could not verify” in two places rather than filling the gap. We do not print a fact we have not checked merely because a page looks more complete with it. A sector number that sends somebody to the wrong gate on a hearing morning, or a rent threshold invented to match the Delhi one, would make this page look finished and make it dangerous. Where we do not know, the page says so, and tells you who does.
Asking costs nothing. Reading this page, searching the directory and sending your matter to the advocates on it are all free, and we take no commission from any advocate on it in either direction — which is also why nobody on that list can pay to be placed higher on it. Where we do work of our own, each document page carries its own price before you order, we confirm the total with you on a call before anything begins, and nothing is payable in advance. The advocate’s fee is a separate matter between you and them, and we stay out of it entirely.
Listed alphabetically. We do not rank, rate or feature advocates, and nobody pays for a position here — the reason is on our Find an Advocate page. Neither reading a profile nor writing to somebody through it costs anything.
It is free to ask, your number stays hidden until an advocate accepts the matter, and nothing is payable in advance for our own work.
Demand pehle se lagi hui hai — appeal karne se wo rukti NAHI, rukwani padti hai alag se (s.220(6)). 30 din CIT(A), phir ITAT. Aur ITAT aakhri jagah hai jahan TATHYA dekhe jaate hain.
ReadYe akeli jagah hai jahan SABIT AAPKO nahi karna. s.19(5) kehti hai ki mana karna jaayaz tha — ye adhikari ko sabit karna hai. Par zyadatar RTI isliye fail hoti hai ki logon ne “kyun” poochha, “kaun sa kaagaz” nahi. 30 din, 30 din, 90 din.
ReadSarkari naukri ka jhagda seedha yahan nahi aata. s.20 kehti hai pehle apne hi vibhag se lado — aur agar wo 6 mahine chup rahe to darwaza khud khul jaata hai. Phir s.21 ki EK SAAL wali ginti. Aur uske baad Supreme Court nahi, High Court.
ReadPehla sawaal ye nahi ki partner ne kya kiya — pehla sawaal ye hai ki jhagda kiska hai. Company kanoon ki nazar me ALAG VYAKTI hai. s.241/244 ka darwaza, aur IBC vasooli ka zariya nahi hai.
ReadYahan koi aapko BULATA nahi — bank bina adalat ke kabza leta hai. s.13(2) ke 60 din, phir s.13(4) par **45 din** me khud DRT jaana padta hai. Civil court band hai (s.34). Appeal par 50% jama.
ReadYe adalat jaan-boojh kar alag banayi gayi — s.13 kehti hai advocate rakhna aapka HAQ tak nahi, s.9 pehle samjhauta karana adalat ka kartavya hai, s.14 me saboot ke niyam dheele hain, aur CONSENT wale decree par appeal HOTI HI NAHI.
ReadTwo doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
Would rather not pick anybody? Tell us the matter instead — one form goes to every advocate at once, and the first to take it up calls you.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates