Ask somebody in Noida what their legal problem is and a surprising number of answers come back to one sentence: the flat is theirs, the paperwork is not. That is not bad luck and it is not a coincidence. The land under most of this city was never sold to anybody. It was leased by an authority, and that single arrangement runs underneath the registry that will not happen, the sale that cannot be completed, the loan the bank is hesitating over and the inheritance nobody got around to recording. This page is about that, and about the courts that deal with it.
Start with the name, because people lose mornings to it. Noida is a city inside a district, and the district is Gautam Buddha Nagar. The court is the district court of Gautam Buddha Nagar. It covers Noida, Greater Noida, Dadri, Dankaur and Jewar, and the district itself is younger than many of the buildings in it — it was carved out of Ghaziabad and Bulandshahr in September 1997.
The court generally sits at Surajpur, which is in Greater Noida, not in Noida city. There is also an outlying court at Jewar. So somebody who types “Noida court” into a phone, copies the first address that appears and leaves at nine can arrive at the wrong place on a morning they could not afford to lose.
We are not printing a street address here. We could not confirm one from the court’s own site, and a confidently wrong address is worse on a hearing day than no address at all. What you want is on your own summons, or on the cause list for your date, or from your advocate. Ask for the building and the court number together, because one without the other is not enough in any district complex.
Which court number, in which building, and whether the date needs you personally or only your advocate. Three questions, one phone call, and they between them account for most of the wasted journeys we hear about.
Uttar Pradesh has one High Court, at Allahabad, with a bench at Lucknow. That bench is not a second option you can pick. Its territory is the Awadh region, fixed by an order that dates back to 1948, and Gautam Buddha Nagar does not sit in it. When the demand for a separate bench for western Uttar Pradesh reached the Supreme Court and was turned down, Gautam Buddha Nagar was listed among the districts whose matters are heard at Allahabad.
So appeals, revisions and writs out of the Noida district judiciary go to the principal seat at Prayagraj. Delhi is closer to most people reading this than either Prayagraj or Lucknow, and Delhi is not available, because a High Court’s writ runs over a territory rather than over a radius.
One qualification, offered because it is true rather than because it will apply to you. The Lucknow bench can be approached where part of the cause of action arose within Awadh. For an ordinary Noida property or family matter that will not be the case. If your dispute genuinely has a limb in eastern Uttar Pradesh, it is a question for your advocate and not a detail to decide from a web page.
Now the thing this page exists for.
Noida and Greater Noida were built on land that the industrial development authorities allotted on lease. The authority did not sell the land and then step back. It remained the lessor, and it is still the lessor. A builder who put up a tower there holds the land under a lease deed with conditions attached to it, and what reaches a flat buyer is an interest carved out of that lease rather than ownership of the ground.
Everybody in Noida half-knows this. Very few people have worked through what it means. It means the authority is a permanent third presence in a transaction most people imagine is between two parties. It means an obligation the builder owes the authority can reach down and stop something in your life. It means steps that are routine elsewhere — selling, mortgaging, transferring after a death — run through a counter you did not expect to deal with.
And it means that when something goes wrong here, the first question is rarely “what does my agreement say”. It is “what does the lease say, and what is outstanding under it”.
The lease deed is the document executed with the authority. It carries the term, the rent, the conditions on use and construction, and the restrictions on transfer. The Greater Noida authority’s own scheme material speaks of ninety years from the date the lease deed is executed, and it also sets out that an allottee is to execute the lease deed and take physical possession within sixty days of the possession offer letter.
You will find other numbers quoted elsewhere, ninety-nine among them, and schemes have differed over the years. We are not going to choose one for your property. The deed for your own plot or tower says what it says, and that is the only version that matters when something is contested.
A great many flat owners in Noida have never held the lease deed in their hands, because the one that matters was executed between the authority and the builder long before they arrived. Ask for it. If you cannot get it from the builder, an advocate can tell you how it can be obtained and what to look for in it. Going into a dispute without having read the document everything hangs on is a bad start that is entirely avoidable.
Picture the chain, because the shape of it explains almost every Noida problem you have heard about.
| Who | What they hold | What they owe |
|---|---|---|
| The authority | The land. It is the lessor and it stays the lessor | To grant and permit, on the terms of the lease |
| The builder or allottee | A lease of the land, with conditions | Lease money and charges to the authority, and the flat to you |
| You | Your agreement with the builder, and in time a sub-lease | The price, under your agreement |
Look at the middle row. The builder owes in two directions at once, and the two debts are not connected in any way that protects you. You can have paid every rupee on time and still be waiting, because the step that puts the flat in your name on paper is a sub-lease, and a sub-lease moves only when the authority is willing to let it move.
That is the whole mechanism. Everything in the next three sections follows from it.
“Registry nahi ho rahi” has been said in this district more often than almost any other sentence about property, and the people saying it usually assume the fault is somewhere in their own file. Normally it is not.
What happened across a large number of projects is simple to state and was very hard to live through. Builders took land from the authority, paid part of what they owed and did not pay the rest. Towers went up anyway. Buyers paid, took possession, moved in, started their loan repayments. And then the step that would have put the property in their names on paper did not happen, because what the builder owed sat in the way.
People in that position are not tenants and not quite owners. They hold the keys and live there. They cannot sell cleanly. They sometimes cannot borrow against it. If somebody dies, the family finds there is nothing to transmit on paper. Years pass in that condition, and the thing that caused it is a transaction they were never party to.
This is not a problem you can fix by producing better documents. Your receipts are not the issue. The question is what stands between the builder and the authority in your particular project, and the honest first step is to find that out rather than to keep assembling paper you have already assembled. Ask the authority in writing what is pending in your tower, and keep the answer.
In December 2023 the Uttar Pradesh cabinet approved a set of recommendations made by a committee headed by Amitabh Kant on reviving stalled real estate projects. It was aimed squarely at the situation above, and it had four moving parts.
The fourth is the one that mattered to households. For years the answer to a buyer had been, in effect, that their paperwork was hostage to somebody else’s balance sheet. The package said that the two should be pulled apart.
Partly, and unevenly, which is the honest summary of most relief schemes.
By May 2024 it was reported that out of fifty-seven builders, twenty had deposited the first quarter — somewhere in the region of a hundred and seventy crore rupees between them — and that even among those twenty, roughly sixteen hundred registrations were still pending. Some projects moved. Others did not. A builder who did not want to pay was still a builder who did not pay.
We are not going to tell you the position today. It changes, it differs between the Noida and Greater Noida authorities, and it differs between towers inside the same project. The number that matters to you is not a statewide total; it is whether your own builder deposited, and what is recorded against your own tower.
Not “when will my registry happen”. Ask instead: has my builder deposited under the scheme, and is my flat on the list that has gone to the authority for execution of sub-lease? That question has an answer. The first one does not.
Buyers have gone to court about this, and courts have intervened. It is worth being careful about what that means, because it is easy to turn into a promise it cannot bear.
In one Noida project the Allahabad High Court allowed registrations to proceed on a list of buyers after the developer deposited a sum, by way of tripartite sub-lease deeds, in a matter that had dragged on for more than a decade. In another, reporting describes the Supreme Court permitting registrations to go ahead despite the developer’s pending land dues. And in March 2025 the Supreme Court said plainly that it was not happy with the Greater Noida authority’s lack of cooperation in reviving an abandoned housing project.
We are not telling you there is a settled rule that a registry can never be withheld for a builder’s dues. The orders we could verify were specific to particular projects and we have not read the full judgments. What they do establish is that this is contested ground where buyers have won relief, which makes it a question to put to an advocate rather than a closed door to accept. If anybody tells you with complete confidence how your matter will go, they have not read your file.
A seller in a freehold colony finds a buyer, agrees a price and goes to the sub-registrar. In Noida there is a step in the middle, and leaving it until late is how deals collapse.
Because the land is leased, a transfer ordinarily needs the authority’s permission, and a transfer charge is payable. Transfers within a family are treated differently under the authority’s own scheme terms. None of this makes a sale impossible. It makes it a three-step transaction rather than a two-step one, and it means the timeline you promise a buyer has to include a counter you do not control.
The documents themselves are ordinary enough — our pages on the sale deed and the conveyance deed set out what each does. What is not ordinary is the permission sitting behind them, and that is the part to start early.
This one hurts families later rather than immediately, which is exactly why it gets left.
When the person in whose name the property stands dies, the interest passes under succession law. The authority’s records do not update themselves. Somebody has to produce the death certificate, establish who the heirs are, and go through whatever the authority requires for transmission and for mutation in its records. Until that is done, the property is in the name of somebody who is no longer alive.
For a few years nobody notices. Then a sale is proposed, or a loan, or a division between siblings, and the gap becomes the obstacle. By that point one of the heirs may also have died, or moved abroad, or stopped speaking to the others, and a straightforward filing has turned into litigation.
Where the heirs agree, the paperwork is not difficult — a legal heir certificate, a succession certificate where that is what is needed, a relinquishment deed where somebody is giving up a share, and mutation to get the records to match. Where they do not agree, our family property guide explains what a partition actually involves and why it is slower than people expect.
Lending against Noida property happens every day, so nothing here should alarm anybody. But the lease shapes it.
What secures a loan has to be consistent with the lease, and lenders look closely at the authority’s position and at whether the sub-lease in the borrower’s favour exists. Where a registry is still pending, that fact alone changes the conversation, and borrowers who discover it at sanction stage lose both time and the deal they had lined up.
The useful habit is simple: raise it with the lender at the start, in those words. Say the property is leasehold from the authority, say whether the sub-lease has been executed, and let them tell you what they need. Our home loan documentation and mortgage documentation pages set out the papers that go with it.
If you are a landlord or a tenant in Noida, read this section before you act on anything you were told earlier in the year.
Uttar Pradesh had the Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act of 1972 for half a century. In 2021 the State replaced it with the Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, which repealed the old Act and set up a Rent Authority and a Rent Tribunal with powers to fix and revise rent and to deal with disputes.
In August 2026 a division bench of the Allahabad High Court struck a large piece of that down. In Inder Bhushan Sawhney v. Kanchan Kumari Jain (Dead) and others, Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Swarupama Chaturvedi held Sections 8, 9, 10, 38 and 42 of the 2021 Act to be invalid, and said of the 1972 Act that it
“springs back to life, of its own to the extent required.”
Allahabad High Court, August 2026 — Inder Bhushan Sawhney v. Kanchan Kumari Jain (Dead) and othersThe reasoning matters as much as the result. Sections 8, 9 and 10 let a Rent Authority determine and revise rent, and the court found that mechanism to be in conflict with the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Sections 38 and 42 set up a separate forum that cut across the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 — and a State law can displace a central law in that way only with the President’s assent under Article 254(2), which had not been obtained. Rent Authority orders made under those provisions were set aside in the petitions before the court.
Three things, and then one honest gap.
| If you are | What this changes |
|---|---|
| In a live dispute before a Rent Authority under one of the struck-down sections | The ground under it has moved. Do not keep going on the old footing — get advice on where the matter now belongs. |
| Holding an agreement already concluded, whose validity nobody is disputing | The judgment protected concluded matters, which continue under the repealed Act read with the Transfer of Property Act and the Small Cause Courts Act. |
| About to let or take premises | Put it in writing. That requirement was not struck down, and it was the sensible course anyway. |
The gap: how the Rent Authority and the Tribunal function from here, in day-to-day practice, is not something we can tell you from a judgment summary, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we can say is that a ruling of this size takes months to settle into practice, and that the months in between are exactly when people act on out-of-date advice. If you have money or possession riding on a Noida tenancy right now, this is the time to spend an hour with somebody who is reading the orders as they come.
Section 4 of the 2021 Act was not among the provisions struck down, and it says something short and useful: no person shall let or take on rent any premises except by an agreement in writing.
Take that as the floor rather than the ceiling. An oral tenancy is an argument with no referee. The rent, the term, the notice, the deposit and how it comes back, who repairs what, what happens if somebody wants out early — every one of those becomes a question of whose memory the court prefers. A drafted rent agreement costs very little next to one dispute, and the price is on that page before you order anything.
The Delhi position is a different statute and works differently; if your tenancy is there rather than here, our Delhi landlord and tenant guide is the page you want. And if the property is in Gurugram, Haryana has its own Act again — that one is on our Gurugram page. Three neighbouring cities, three different rent laws, which is a fair summary of what NCR does to people.
Complaints about a registered project go to the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority. Its headquarters is at Lucknow, and it has a regional office at Greater Noida, which matters to anybody in this district who was imagining a trip across the State for every step.
An appeal from the Authority’s order lies to the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal at Lucknow. Section 44 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 fixes the window at sixty days from receipt of the order, with power in the Tribunal to entertain a late appeal where it is satisfied there was sufficient cause.
Sixty days is short, and it starts running from receipt rather than from the day the order sinks in. If something has gone against you, the clock is already moving while you are deciding whether to fight it.
How to write the complaint, what the Authority can actually order and what happens at execution are all on our RERA complaint guide, which is the long page on that subject. This one stays on its own ground: which authority, and where the appeal goes.
| Door | Fits when | Where the detail is |
|---|---|---|
| UP RERA | The project is registered and the complaint is about what the Act requires of a promoter | RERA complaint guide |
| Consumer commission | The claim is framed as deficiency in service to a consumer | Consumer commission guide |
| Insolvency | The promoter is already in an insolvency process and ordinary recovery has stopped | NCLT |
| Civil court | The claim is contractual and does not fit the others | Slower, and sometimes the only honest fit |
Noida adds one consideration the others do not have. Whichever door you choose, the land is leased from the authority, and the authority’s position will turn up inside your matter whether or not you wanted it there. An advocate who asks about the lease in the first conversation has understood the district.
Gautam Buddh Nagar has had a police commissionerate since January 2020, under Uttar Pradesh Police. Before that it ran on the older district pattern. The change matters to you in a small way: the hierarchy above the station is a commissionerate hierarchy, and it is a Uttar Pradesh chain of command. A complaint to a senior officer goes up that chain. Nothing you may have read about escalation in Delhi applies.
The statute does not change at the border. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is central law and the sections work the same way in Noida as anywhere else.
Our FIR guide takes those provisions apart step by step — what a refusal looks like, who to go to next, and the handful of things worth noting down before you leave the counter. The examples in it are from Delhi; the Act behind them is national, so it reads across to a Noida thana without adjustment. Where a person is already in custody, that is a different and more urgent page: arrest and bail.
One mechanism ignores the boundary on purpose, and in this region it is the single most useful thing to know.
A cognizable offence has to be written down at whichever thana you walk into. The place it happened does not control where it can be recorded; once it is on paper, the station that actually has the territory receives it. People call this a Zero FIR because the receiving station enters it without a regular number, the number coming later wherever the case settles.
Work out what that is worth in practice. Something has gone wrong in Noida at eleven at night and you have driven home to Delhi. Somebody is hurt and the hospital is here, not there. A woman has been attacked and the station near her is the wrong one on paper. In each of those, the instruction to come back tomorrow and report in the right place is the instruction that loses the evidence. The mechanism exists so that you do not have to obey it.
Registration happens where the property is, before the sub-registrar having jurisdiction over it, under the Registration Act, 1908. Stamp is governed by the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as it applies in Uttar Pradesh, with the State’s own amendments. Rates are set by Uttar Pradesh, and they are not Delhi’s rates or Haryana’s.
One concession is worth naming because it changes the arithmetic for a lot of families. In July 2025 the Uttar Pradesh cabinet approved what the official announcement described as
“a one per cent discount in stamp duty on property worth up to one crore rupees, if it is purchased in the name of a woman”
Uttar Pradesh cabinet decision, July 2025 — as announced officiallyThe earlier benefit was confined to a far smaller value. We are quoting the announcement rather than turning it into a calculation, because the phrase can be read in more than one way and the money is yours, not ours. Before you buy the stamp, get the figure for your own deed from the sub-registrar or from an advocate who has checked it that month.
Circle rates, stamp duty and registration charges are set by the State and revised. A number printed here would be wrong within a year and expensive for whoever believed it. Treat every website quoting a rate, confidently or otherwise, as a prompt to go and ask.
Yes, and there is nothing uncertain about it. Under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 an advocate whose name sits on any State roll holds the right to practise across the whole country, in every court up to the Supreme Court. Which Bar Council issued the enrolment is irrelevant to whether that person may stand up at Gautam Buddha Nagar.
Most people still engage somebody local, and the reasons are sound: the dates are short and frequent, the registry is a counter rather than a website, and the binding High Court is one a local practitioner reads first. Often the arrangement is both — the advocate who knows the matter, and somebody local for routine appearances. If that is how yours will work, settle it openly at the start: who appears on what, who calls you after each date, and how the fee is divided. The ones that go wrong are the ones nobody discussed.
Nobody chooses a court. The dispute decides it, through a handful of connecting facts: the place the cause of action arose, the situation of the property, the residence or place of business of the opposite party, and occasionally a clause the parties wrote into their contract.
For anything about a Noida flat, the property being in Noida usually ends the enquiry. For a contract or a service dispute it is less obvious, and for an employment matter it turns on where the work was done. The thing that never decides it is which court is nearer to your house.
An objection to jurisdiction can be taken late, and often is. When it succeeds, the court fee is gone, the months are gone, and in some matters the limitation period has run out while the case sat in the wrong building. The half hour spent answering the question properly before filing is the cheapest half hour in the whole dispute. And on that subject — limitation is central law, identical in Noida and in Delhi, and it does not pause while you decide where to go.
If your matter is in Gurugram rather than here, the state changes again and so does nearly everything above it; that is on our Gurugram page.
This is not in any statute and it belongs on an honest page about this district.
Work at the Gautam Buddha Nagar courts has been disrupted by abstention from work by members of the bar, and the problem has reached the Supreme Court. In March 2024, after two Supreme Court Bar Association members were assaulted at the district court during a strike, the Supreme Court issued notice to the State over the non-functioning CCTV cameras at the court premises, the District Judge having reported that they were not working.
You cannot do anything about that. You can stop it costing you.
Most first hearings are far less dramatic than people brace for, and most of what makes the day hard is logistics.
| Document | Why it keeps coming up here |
|---|---|
| The lease deed | The document the whole arrangement sits on. Nothing serious can be advised without it |
| Builder-buyer agreement | Your side of the chain, and what a RERA complaint is built out of |
| The payment trail | Receipts and bank entries together. Either alone leaves a gap somebody will use |
| Sale deed / conveyance deed | Where a transfer has happened or is being planned |
| Affidavit | Almost every application is supported by one, and a loose one damages a good case |
| Rent agreement | Required in writing, and now more important than ever given where the law stands |
| Legal notice | Often the first step, and sometimes a precondition |
| Mutation | What makes the records match reality after a transfer or a death |
Each of those pages shows its price before you order, and nothing is payable in advance.
Owners spend months reorganising receipts and chasing the builder’s office, when what is actually stuck is a payment between two other parties. Find out what is outstanding in your tower, in writing, and start from there instead.
A price is agreed, money changes hands, and only then does somebody discover that the authority’s permission is needed and what it costs. Buyers walk away at that point, and they are entitled to.
Nothing happens for five years, and then everything happens at once — a sale falls through, an heir has moved abroad, another has died, and a filing that would have taken weeks becomes a suit.
A sizeable part of the 2021 tenancy law is no longer standing and the older Act has partly revived. Advice that was accurate in June may not be now, and the people most at risk are the ones who were confident.
Surajpur is not Noida city, Prayagraj is not Lucknow, and neither of them is Delhi. Each of those three mistakes costs a day at least, and the third can cost a case.
Last reviewed 1 October 2026. The statutes on this page move slowly; the scheme figures, the court location and the position on registries move quickly. Re-check the second group before you rely on it.
This page is about a place and a lease. Most people arriving here have an underlying dispute with its own page, and that is where the answer is.
| If your matter is about | Read |
|---|---|
| The flat itself — possession late, project stalled, promoter not answering | Filing a RERA complaint |
| Relatives and a shared house — who gets what | Family property disputes |
| A tenancy where the premises are in Delhi | Landlord and tenant disputes |
| Anything on the Haryana side — Gurugram and beyond | Courts in Gurugram |
| The station will not write it down | FIR registration |
| Somebody has been picked up and is not home | Arrest and bail |
| An amount owed, in either direction | Recovering money owed |
| A cheque that came back | Section 138 — cheque bounce |
| Something bought or a service paid for that failed | The consumer commission |
| An unidentified paper from a court or a lawyer | A notice or summons has arrived |
| Not sure this needs a lawyer at all | Do I actually need a lawyer |
Plenty of people who should be in court are not in court, and the reason is money rather than merits. There is a statutory answer to that which almost nobody is told about. Advocates are provided at State expense to people who fall within defined categories, the categories reach further than most readers expect, and the route to them runs through the legal services authority rather than through any private office. It works in Uttar Pradesh the same way it works everywhere else. We have set out who qualifies and how to ask on our page about whether you need a lawyer. Spend five minutes there before you decide that nothing can be done.
Two side doors are worth a line each. Lok Adalat disposes of compromisable matters by consent, and what it passes is final between the parties. Mediation runs through court-annexed centres, and for a family or commercial dispute that has stopped moving it is frequently the fastest honest way out.
A page this long can leave the wrong impression, so here is the boundary. Nobody at Legal Space Services is going to argue your case. We are not a law firm and we are not allowed to be one. The work we do is paperwork and coordination: preparing documents, executing them, getting them registered or attested, holding a matter together while it moves, and connecting people with advocates whom they then engage on their own account.
For a Noida matter that usually means three things. We prepare the documents the matter needs, each priced on its page, payable after. We say which forum the matter appears to belong to and what the sensible next move is, up to and including telling you that you do not need us for it. And where an advocate is needed, the matter goes out once to the whole directory instead of to one inbox, so whoever is free picks it up and telephones you.
| We will not | Why |
|---|---|
| Point at one name and call it the right one | Nothing we hold would justify that, and advocates may not be ranked under the Bar Council rules |
| Put a figure on what an advocate will charge | That money never passes through us. Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly |
| Tell you when your registry will happen | Nobody knows. Anybody who gives you a date is guessing with your hope |
| Print a stamp duty figure or a transfer charge | The State sets them and revises them, and a stale number costs you a trip |
| Write down something we think is false | An affidavit is sworn. A paper that falls apart under questioning does more damage than the gap it was filling |
One more, and it is the reason three sections above say that we could not confirm something. A page looks more finished when every gap is filled, and filling a gap you have not checked is how a reader ends up at the wrong gate, or paying the wrong stamp, or arguing a rule that was struck down six weeks ago. Where we have not verified a thing, we say so and we tell you who can. That is a worse page and a better service, and we would rather have the second.
Nothing, to begin with. Reading this, searching the directory and sending your matter to the advocates on it carry no charge, and no advocate pays us anything in either direction, which is also why nobody on that list can buy a better position on it. Where we do work ourselves, every document page carries its own price before you order, we confirm the full figure with you on a call before anything starts, and nothing is payable in advance. Whatever your advocate charges is settled between the two of you and we stay out of it.
Listed alphabetically. We do not rank, rate or feature advocates, and nobody pays for a position here — the reason is on our Find an Advocate page. Neither reading a profile nor writing to somebody through it costs anything.
Asking costs nothing, your number stays hidden until an advocate takes the matter up, and nothing is payable in advance for our own work.
Demand pehle se lagi hui hai — appeal karne se wo rukti NAHI, rukwani padti hai alag se (s.220(6)). 30 din CIT(A), phir ITAT. Aur ITAT aakhri jagah hai jahan TATHYA dekhe jaate hain.
ReadYe akeli jagah hai jahan SABIT AAPKO nahi karna. s.19(5) kehti hai ki mana karna jaayaz tha — ye adhikari ko sabit karna hai. Par zyadatar RTI isliye fail hoti hai ki logon ne “kyun” poochha, “kaun sa kaagaz” nahi. 30 din, 30 din, 90 din.
ReadSarkari naukri ka jhagda seedha yahan nahi aata. s.20 kehti hai pehle apne hi vibhag se lado — aur agar wo 6 mahine chup rahe to darwaza khud khul jaata hai. Phir s.21 ki EK SAAL wali ginti. Aur uske baad Supreme Court nahi, High Court.
ReadPehla sawaal ye nahi ki partner ne kya kiya — pehla sawaal ye hai ki jhagda kiska hai. Company kanoon ki nazar me ALAG VYAKTI hai. s.241/244 ka darwaza, aur IBC vasooli ka zariya nahi hai.
ReadYahan koi aapko BULATA nahi — bank bina adalat ke kabza leta hai. s.13(2) ke 60 din, phir s.13(4) par **45 din** me khud DRT jaana padta hai. Civil court band hai (s.34). Appeal par 50% jama.
ReadYe adalat jaan-boojh kar alag banayi gayi — s.13 kehti hai advocate rakhna aapka HAQ tak nahi, s.9 pehle samjhauta karana adalat ka kartavya hai, s.14 me saboot ke niyam dheele hain, aur CONSENT wale decree par appeal HOTI HI NAHI.
ReadTwo doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
Would rather not pick anybody? Tell us the matter instead — one form goes to every advocate at once, and the first to take it up calls you.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates