The card is a record, not a benefit, and almost everything that goes wrong here comes from believing otherwise. Free, in the Government’s own words. The portal says registration is totally free; a separate release says completely free of cost. Anybody charging you for the card is charging for something given away. And it never expires. No renewal, no renewal fee. If somebody is collecting money from you every year for this, they are collecting it for nothing. The age limit people quote does not exist. The published eligibility is sixteen and above — no upper figure. And the proof is in the Government’s own numbers: 20.53% of registered workers are over fifty. What registration actually buys is a place on the list that fifteen schemes draw from, reachable since the One-Stop Solution launched on 21 October 2024. Joining any of them is still a separate step, and that is the step nobody takes. One change almost nobody has heard: the rural employment guarantee is now the VB-G RAM G Act, 2025, and it guarantees 125 days, not 100. The portal’s own page has not caught up, and we say so below.
What you end up with is a card carrying your name, your photograph and a twelve-digit number. It looks like the other cards in the folder, which is exactly the problem, because the other cards in the folder mostly entitle you to something and this one does not.
It is a receipt. It says: this person has been recorded on the national database of unorganised workers, and here is the permanent number against which that record sits. Everything useful follows from the record. Nothing follows from the card itself.
Understanding that one distinction prevents nearly every disappointment on this subject. The worker who waited two years for money that was never going to arrive, the worker who paid for a renewal that does not exist, the worker who was told the card was made wrongly when it was made perfectly: all three went wrong at the same point, which is believing the card was the thing.
The sentence to carry through this page. The card is not the benefit. The card is how the benefit finds you. And being findable is worth having, free, in twenty minutes — but it is not the same as having been found.
The thing the card points at is a Government database, described in the Government’s own release as the country’s first Aadhaar-authenticated National Database of Unorganised Workers. It was launched on 26 August 2021, and as at 18 August 2026 it had recorded 31.89 crore registrations.
That figure is worth sitting with for a second, because it changes how you read the whole subject. Thirty-one crore is not a pilot scheme or a scheme for a particular trade. It is a substantial share of the country’s working population, and it is the register a Government reaches for when it wants to deliver something to unorganised workers quickly.
The published profile of who is on it is just as useful. On figures as at 20 August 2026, women account for 54.28 per cent of registered workers against 45.72 per cent men, and the largest numbers come from agriculture, domestic and household work, construction and apparel. If you work in any of those and are not on it, you are in an unusual minority rather than ahead of the curve.
The number on the card is the Universal Account Number, and the portal describes it as a twelve-digit number uniquely assigned to each unorganised worker after registration, which does not change once assigned.
Permanence is the whole point of it. A worker in this kind of employment changes employer, changes State, changes trade and changes phone, and every one of those changes breaks a thread somewhere. The number does not break. It is the one piece of identification in this field that follows a person rather than a job.
Which makes it worth treating like a document rather than like a login. Write it on paper. Put that paper where the family keeps the Aadhaar and the ration card. A number that exists only in a phone that gets lost, sold or broken is a number that has to be recovered at a counter.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
It does not pay you anything. No monthly amount, no lump sum, no allowance. There is no mechanism by which registration causes money to arrive.
It does not insure you. Neither the life cover nor the accident cover on the platform attaches to you by registering. Each is a scheme with its own enrolment and its own premium.
It does not give you a pension. The pension schemes have their own age and income conditions and their own contributions.
It does not prove how long you have worked. It records that you registered, not your service, and it will not settle a dispute with an employer about either.
It does not put you on your State’s welfare board. That is a separate register with a separate card, and the commonest mistake in this field is doing one and assuming it covered the other.
None of that is a defect. A database is a database. But every one of those five is something a worker has been told the card does, usually by somebody who was taking money to make it.
It is worth saying plainly that the design makes sense. A register that paid out by itself would need to test every entrant against the conditions of every scheme at the moment of registration, which would make registering slow, documentary and exclusionary — the opposite of what a database covering thirty-one crore people needs to be.
So the Government split it. Getting onto the register is deliberately almost frictionless: an identity number, a phone, no income proof, no educational qualification, no fee. The conditions live in the schemes, where they belong, and the register tells the schemes who is there.
Seen that way the thing is sensibly built and the failure is one of explanation. Nobody told the worker that there were two steps. And the people who did the registering had every commercial reason not to mention the second one.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
The category is unorganised worker, and the portal describes that as home-based, self-employed or wage work in the unorganised sector, where units employ fewer than ten workers and are not covered by the State insurance or provident fund machinery.
In practice that is most of the working country. A mason, a domestic worker, a farm labourer, a rickshaw driver, a tailor, a street vendor, a delivery rider, a loader, a barber, a small shopkeeper working on his own, a woman doing piece-work at home. Not a category of hardship, a category of employment structure.
If you are reading this wondering whether your work counts, the test is not how much you earn or how respectable the trade is. It is whether you sit outside the organised machinery. Our labour card page covers the State board side of the same world, and a worker who belongs in one usually belongs in both.
Two memberships put you out, and the portal is direct about it: members of the Employees State Insurance Corporation or the Employees Provident Fund Organisation are not unorganised workers.
That is not a technical bar to be worked around; it is the definition. Those memberships mean somebody is already running organised-sector social security for you, and this register exists for people who have none. A registration made by stepping over that is not a registration worth having, and we will not make one.
The Government release adds a third: a worker must not be an income tax-payer. That one sits oddly next to something the portal itself says, and the next section is about exactly that.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
There is one more group worth mentioning because they fall between the categories: workers in the organised sector whose employer has never actually enrolled them. On paper they are in a factory with a provident fund; in reality nothing was ever deducted or deposited. That is a problem with the employer rather than with this register, and it is the employer side our provident fund registration page deals with. Registering here on the footing that the employer defaulted is not the answer, because the question the register asks is about membership rather than about whether somebody did their duty.
Here is a thing we found while checking this page, and we are putting it in front of you rather than resolving it quietly in our own favour.
The portal’s own Frequently Asked Questions say: there are no income criteria for registering on eShram as unorganised worker. The Government release says: a worker must not be an income tax-payer.
Both are official. Neither is a misprint. And a reader who has been given one of those sentences and not the other will walk away with a different idea of whether they can register.
We set out both, and then set out what appears to separate them, in the eligibility sections below. What we do not do is pick the one that suits us and present it as the rule. On a question this basic, a page that gives you one sentence and hides the other is not saving you trouble; it is choosing for you.
The published eligibility is short enough to quote whole: any worker aged sixteen years and above, engaged in the unorganised sector, is eligible to register.
Sixteen is unusually low for a Government register and it is deliberate. Young people enter unorganised work early, and a register meant to find unorganised workers that started at eighteen would miss them at exactly the age they are least protected. The Government’s own figures show it is being used: 0.08 per cent of registrants are aged 16 to 18, which on thirty-one crore registrations is a substantial number of individuals.
That has a consequence worth knowing if you are the parent of a working sixteen-year-old. The register is open to them. Most of the schemes on the platform are not, because those start at eighteen. Registering early still makes sense, because the record is there when the schemes become available.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
There is a second reason to register a young worker early, and this register has no part in it. A sixteen or seventeen-year-old in unorganised work is usually somebody whose schooling stopped for money rather than for want of ability, and the support that exists for that is educational rather than occupational. Our scholarship documentation page covers what is available there, and for a household like this it can be worth more than anything else on the welfare list.
Now the correction that matters most, because it stops people registering who are entitled to.
You will be told, confidently and often, that this is for people aged sixteen to fifty-nine. We looked for that upper figure in the material we worked from. It is not there. The published condition is sixteen years and above, and no upper limit is stated in either the portal’s answers or the Government release.
Where the belief almost certainly comes from. Several schemes on the platform do have upper age limits — the pension schemes close at forty, the life cover at fifty, the accident cover at seventy. Somebody has read a scheme’s limit as the register’s limit, and the mistake has been copied until it sounds like law. Registration and enrolment are two different things, and only one of them has an age ceiling.
So if you are fifty-five, or sixty-two, and somebody has told you not to bother, check it rather than accepting it. The worst case is that you spend twenty minutes finding out.
The Government does not merely say there is no upper limit; its own published profile proves it. On figures as at 20 August 2026:
| Age band | Share of registered workers |
|---|---|
| 16 to 18 | 0.08% |
| 18 to 40 | 55.21% |
| 40 to 50 | 24.18% |
| Above 50 | 20.53% |
Read the bottom row again. More than a fifth of everybody on this register is over fifty. That is not a handful of exceptions slipping through a rule; it is a fifth of thirty-one crore people, and it settles the question better than any argument could.
It also tells you something about who this register is reaching. Unorganised work does not stop at fifty, and for a great many people it gets harder and more precarious after it. The schemes that matter at that age are the health and old-age ones rather than the pension schemes, which is why our Ayushman card and senior citizen card pages are the useful next reading for an older worker rather than anything on this one.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
The portal’s own answer is unqualified: there are no income criteria for registering on eShram as unorganised worker. It adds, in the same breath, that no educational qualification is required either.
That matters because income thresholds are where most Government registrations exclude people, and because a worker who has been turned away from something else on income grounds will assume the same applies here. On the portal’s own statement, it does not. There is no rupee figure to be under.
It also means there is nothing to prove. No salary slip, no income certificate, no declaration of what you earn. If somebody registering you asks for an income certificate for this purpose, they are asking for a document the process does not call for.
What it does not do is name a number. There is no figure in either source below which you qualify and above which you do not, which is worth stating explicitly because readers reach for one. The portal says there are no income criteria; the release names a status rather than an amount.
The Government release puts it differently and more restrictively: a worker must not be an income tax-payer, nor a member of the provident fund or State insurance machinery.
That is a real condition and it is worth taking at face value. It is also a different kind of condition from the one the portal was answering, and the difference is the whole of the reconciliation.
One practical note before the reconciliation. Holding a permanent account number is not the same as being an income-tax payer, and the two get run together constantly. Almost every adult in the country now holds one, because it is needed to open a bank account and to do a great many ordinary things; our PAN page covers that. Having the number says nothing about whether you file.
Nor does the release say anything about past years. Somebody who filed a return once, during a year of better earnings, and has not filed since is in a position neither document addresses, and we are not going to invent an answer for it.
A threshold and a status are not the same test, and that appears to be what separates the two statements.
A threshold is a number you must be under. Neither source states one, which is what the portal’s answer is saying: there is no income figure that disqualifies you.
A status is a thing you either are or are not. Being an income-tax payer is a status, and the release treats it as a disqualification.
Read that way both statements stand. There is no income limit to be under, and separately, a person who is an income-tax payer is outside the category. Those two propositions do not contradict each other, and together they are probably what the framework intends.
But we are offering that as the distinction between two Government statements, not as a rule either of them announces. If your own position turns on this — if you are close to the line, or you have filed in some years and not others — ask at a Common Service Centre or a State Seva Kendra and get the answer for your own facts rather than relying on anybody’s reading, ours included.
This is the disqualification that actually catches people, and unlike the income question there is no ambiguity in it at all. If you are a member of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation or the Employees State Insurance Corporation, you are not an unorganised worker for this purpose.
The practical difficulty is that workers often do not know. A contractor deducts something from the wage and calls it a deduction; an establishment enrolled the worker years ago and the worker never saw a card. The honest first step for anybody unsure is to find out, because a registration standing on a false footing is worse than none.
There is a certain neatness in where those two memberships now sit. Both the State insurance and the provident fund statutes, and the unorganised workers statute that created this very category, have been folded into the same Code on Social Security, 2020, in force since 21 November 2025. The definition and the disqualification are in one book. Our provident fund registration page deals with the other side of that line, for a business crossing into it.
None of which is a reason to hide a change. A register that says you are an unorganised worker when you have been in a provident-fund job for three years is a record that will be read by somebody eventually, and the person it embarrasses is the worker rather than whoever filled the form.
The portal addresses this directly: a worker who moves to the organised sector is entitled only to benefits for organised-sector workers.
So the registration does not vanish and nobody comes to take the card away, but the category it rests on has stopped describing you, and the protections that now apply are the organised-sector ones. In most cases that is a better position to be in rather than a worse one, which is worth saying because it sounds like a loss.
Where this bites is in the in-between life that is extremely common in this kind of work: eight months on a site with no provident fund, four months in a factory with one, and back again. There is no clean answer to be given on a page for that pattern, and anybody offering one has not thought about it. What is sensible is to keep the record truthful about what you are doing now and to ask at a centre when the pattern changes.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
It is worth listing what this registration does not ask for, because the list is short and the asking is where workers get fleeced.
No income proof. The portal states there are no income criteria.
No educational qualification. Stated in the same answer.
No proof of the work itself. Unlike the State welfare board registration, where proof of days worked is the thing that stops most people, this register does not require it.
No file of documents at a centre. The portal says a worker attending a Common Service Centre does not submit documents, and should bring the Aadhaar number and a mobile phone.
No fee. Said twice in Government material, in two different documents.
Keep that list in mind when somebody tells you what they need from you. The contrast with the welfare board registration is instructive: that one genuinely does turn on proving your work, which is why the two processes feel so different and why conflating them leads people astray.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Nothing, and the Government says so twice. The portal: registration on eShram portal is totally free. The release: registration on the e-Shram Portal is completely free of cost.
We are putting both quotations on the page on purpose. A worker who has been charged for this has usually been charged by somebody local and trusted, and a single sentence from a website is easy to wave away. Two separate Government documents saying the same thing in slightly different words is harder.
What you may legitimately be charged for. Somebody’s time, if they do it for you. That is a service and it can be priced, including by us. What cannot legitimately be charged for is the card, the registration, or a renewal. If a charge is being described as any of those three, it is being described dishonestly.
Two things, and the second one decides everything about how the next twenty minutes go.
Your Aadhaar number, because the registration runs on Aadhaar-based electronic verification.
A mobile number, preferably the one linked to your Aadhaar. The word preferably is doing a lot of work there, and the section after next is about what happens when it is not.
That is the list. Everything else people are asked for — a bank passbook, a ration card, a photograph, a certificate of anything — is not part of this. Some of it is worth having anyway for the schemes that follow, which is a different reason.
What people find hardest about doing it themselves is not any single step but the absence of anybody to confirm that a step worked. If a screen does something unexpected, there is nobody to ask. That is a real reason to use a centre and not a shameful one, and it is a different reason from the ones usually given.
If your mobile is Aadhaar-linked, self-registration on the portal is genuinely straightforward and we would rather tell you so than take three hundred rupees for twenty minutes.
The shape of it is: enter the Aadhaar number, receive and enter the one-time password on the linked mobile, confirm the details that come across from Aadhaar, fill in the work details and the bank details, and complete. The identity fields are not typed in by you, which is why name mismatches cannot arise at this stage and why the photograph is not something you supply.
Two pieces of advice for doing it yourself, both learned from files where it went wrong. Take your time over the occupation, because that is the one field with downstream consequences. And when the number appears at the end, write it down before closing the page.
It is also worth knowing what the failure looks like, because it is not announced clearly. The screen waits for a code that is never going to arrive, and a worker who does not know why concludes that the portal is broken, or that their Aadhaar has a problem, or that they are not eligible. None of those is true. One number simply does not match another.
Here is the single commonest reason a self-registration attempt fails, and it has nothing to do with eligibility.
The process sends a one-time password to the mobile number recorded against your Aadhaar. If the number you are holding is not that number — because you changed SIM, because the Aadhaar was made years ago with a number you no longer have, because somebody else’s number was used at the time — the password goes somewhere you cannot reach and the registration stops.
This is worth checking before you start rather than discovering at the password step. And it is worth fixing on its own merits whichever way you then register, because that linked number is the gate to a great deal besides this: our Aadhaar update page covers getting it changed, and the same fix unlocks a long list of other processes.
You do not have to fix the Aadhaar link first. The portal gives a route that works regardless: register at a Common Service Centre or a State Seva Kendra.
The portal also records how to find one, pointing to the centre-locator service, and it records what to bring, which is the Aadhaar number and a mobile phone rather than a folder of papers.
For a great many workers this is simply the better route even where the phone is linked, because somebody at the counter does the typing and the occupation field gets filled by a person who has filled it a thousand times. The trade-off is the journey and the queue.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
What to bring is short and it is the same list as before: the Aadhaar number and a mobile phone. The portal records that a worker attending a centre does not submit documents. If the person at the counter asks for a photograph, a bank passbook or a certificate of anything, they are asking for something this process does not require, and it is fair to say so.
The thing that makes the centre route work when the phone does not is biometrics. The portal states that a worker whose mobile number is not linked to Aadhaar can register at a Common Service Centre or State Seva Kendra using biometric authentication.
In other words the fingerprint stands in for the one-time password. The identity is still being proved against Aadhaar; only the method of proving it changes.
Two practical notes. Biometrics fail more often for people whose hands do the kind of work this register exists for — masons, farm workers, anyone whose fingertips are worn — so it is worth going at a time when you can wait and try again rather than at the end of a working day. And if biometric authentication fails repeatedly, the answer is to go back to fixing the Aadhaar mobile link, not to give up.
One thing follows from that which is worth knowing before anybody worries. An old or unflattering photograph does not make the card invalid or the registration defective. It is a copy of an identity record, and the identity record is what any process will verify against. Changing it is tidiness, not repair.
People are regularly puzzled by the photograph on the card, which is often old and occasionally of somebody barely recognisable. The explanation is in the portal’s own answer: the photograph comes from Aadhaar.
You do not upload one. Nobody takes one at the counter. The image is pulled across from the identity record, which is why a photograph taken for an Aadhaar enrolment fifteen years ago is the photograph on a card issued last week.
So the order of operations for changing it is fixed and worth knowing. Update the photograph in Aadhaar first, then complete Aadhaar re-eKYC on the portal. Doing it the other way round, or asking the portal to change the picture, achieves nothing — and that is a real saving, because this is a thing people spend afternoons at the wrong counter over.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
The registration ends with a twelve-digit number. That number is the registration, as far as every later process is concerned, and it does not change for the rest of your working life.
So treat it the way the family treats the Aadhaar and the ration card: on paper, in the same place, legible to somebody who is not you. Our DigiLocker page covers keeping a digital copy as well, which is sensible, but a digital copy and a phone are the same single point of failure.
One more line worth adding to that paper: the mobile number the registration was made with. If the record ever has to be recovered, that is the detail that does it, and it is the detail nobody remembers two years later.
The portal says it plainly: the card never expires and does not need renewing. It adds the sensible rider that the details on it should be kept current, which is a different activity and also free.
That makes this one of the very few documents in an Indian household folder with no expiry date and no renewal cycle. No annual fee, no validity period, no lapse. Once you are on the register you are on it.
What the portal does say, in the same answer, is that the details should be kept current. That is the grain of truth the renewal story grows out of: there is something worth doing periodically, it is just not a renewal and it is not paid for. The next several sections are about what that actually involves.
Somebody is, in a great many villages and localities, and it is worth naming the pattern because it is so consistent.
The card is made for a fee that should not have been charged. A year or two later the same person returns saying the card is expiring, or has been deactivated, or that the Government has made renewal compulsory, and asks for a smaller amount. The second payment is easier to collect than the first, because the worker now has something they are afraid of losing.
There is no renewal. There is no deactivation for non-renewal. There is no annual fee. If somebody tells you otherwise, ask them to put it in writing on their own letterhead. That request ends the conversation every time, and it costs you nothing to make.
We would add one thing in fairness. Some of the people doing this genuinely believe it, because they were told it by somebody above them in the same chain. Being wrong rather than dishonest does not make the money any less wasted, but it changes how you handle the conversation.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Updating is the activity that replaces renewal, and it is the one worth doing. The portal describes logging in with the UAN and a one-time password, editing the relevant fields such as address, contact or bank details, saving, and verifying any change by one-time password where prompted. A service centre can do the same.
The address matters more in this field than people expect, because a migrant worker’s registered address and current address are often several hundred kilometres apart, and State processes read the registered one.
The honest position on which address to record is that it depends on where you expect to claim, and nobody can decide that for you on a page. What is clear is that an address nobody at either end would recognise is the worst of the options. If your situation is complicated, a domicile certificate may be the document that settles which State treats you as its own.
The mobile number is the field most worth keeping right and the most frequently wrong, because numbers change and nobody goes back to tell a database.
For this field specifically the portal points at the Aadhaar-based update route under the already-registered menu, or a visit to a Common Service Centre or State Seva Kendra. Which tells you something about how the system is built: the mobile number is tied to the identity record, so changing it here is really a matter of coming back through Aadhaar.
And the thing to refuse, politely and always. If somebody registering you offers to put their number on your record so that they can handle messages for you, say no. Every later communication, including from schemes, goes to that number. It is how a worker ends up having to pay the same person again to find out what their own record says.
Bank details are among the fields the portal lists as editable, and getting them right pays off somewhere else entirely, not on the registration at all.
Two of the most useful schemes on the platform — the life cover and the accident cover — work by automatic debit from a bank account, on the portal’s own description of their eligibility. No account with consent to automatic debit, no cover. So the bank field is not administrative tidiness; it is the precondition for the cheapest protection available to a worker in this category.
If there is no account, that is the thing to fix first and it is fixable: our bank account opening documentation page covers what is needed. A worker with a registration and no bank account has done the free half and left the useful half undone.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Names on this register come from Aadhaar, which is both the reason mismatches are rare at registration and the reason they are awkward to fix afterwards.
If the name on the card is wrong, it is wrong on Aadhaar, and that is where the correction has to happen. Aadhaar permits only a limited number of changes to some fields, so a name correction there is not a thing to spend casually — our Aadhaar update page sets out what that involves.
Where the name is right here and wrong somewhere else, the problem is at the other end. A mismatch between the name on Aadhaar and on a permanent account number is its own well-worn difficulty, and our PAN and Aadhaar name mismatch page deals with it. Fixing that one tends to unlock several things at once.
Where a record has to be put right and the supporting documents do not agree with each other, that reconciliation is its own small piece of work rather than something done at the counter in five minutes, and our document verification step exists for exactly that: finding the mismatch before a process stops on it.
Of all the fields on this registration the occupation is the one people treat most casually and the one with the longest reach.
It is what a scheme reads when it looks for people in a trade. It is what a State reads when it decides who to contact, and the Government release records that construction workers’ data specifically is shared with States and Union Territories. A wrong occupation does not produce an error message; it produces silence from the processes that would have reached you.
Which is also why we will not record a trade you do not practise. People are advised, usually by somebody at a counter, to put down construction because construction workers get more. Leaving aside that this is a false entry in a Government database against the worker’s own name, it does not even work: the State process that follows a construction entry will ask for proof of construction work, and there will not be any.
If the honest answer is that you do several kinds of work, record the main one and keep it current when the main one changes. That is a truthful record and it is also the one most likely to reach you.
Any change made at the Aadhaar end has to be brought across, and the mechanism the portal names is Aadhaar re-eKYC. The photograph answer is the clearest illustration: update the photograph in Aadhaar, then complete re-eKYC here.
The useful generalisation is that this register is downstream of the identity record. It does not hold its own version of your name, your date of birth or your face; it holds a copy, taken at a moment in time. So the order for anything identity-related is always the same: fix it at the source, then refresh it here.
And the corollary, which saves a wasted trip: if somebody at a counter tells you they can change your name or your date of birth on this register directly, they are describing something the system does not do.
Because nothing expires, nothing prompts you. That is pleasant and it is also why records go stale.
Is the mobile number on the record the number in your hand? The most important line, because everything arrives there.
Is the address one somebody would recognise? At the end you expect to claim at.
Is the occupation what you are actually doing now? Work changes in this field more than in any other.
Is there a bank account on it, with consent to automatic debit? Because two schemes depend on it.
Have you joined any scheme at all? The question that matters most and gets asked least.
Pick a date you already remember — a festival, a birthday, the day the lease renews — and do it then. A check nobody has diarised is a check nobody does.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
There is a second reason this page sets the schemes out at length rather than listing names and linking away. A worker who has been told that the card pays nothing will, quite reasonably, stop reading. The point of the detail is to show that there is something substantial at the end of it: a pension, cover worth two lakh for twenty rupees a year, five lakh of hospitalisation. The card is not the benefit, but the benefits are real, and they are reachable from here.
Now the part that justifies the whole exercise. The Government has brought fifteen social security and welfare schemes together on this platform, so that a registered worker can see them and reach them from one place.
The word to hold on to is reach. The platform shows you the schemes and takes you to them. It does not enrol you, and nothing on it starts paying because you are looking at it.
What follows is what the portal publishes about the main ones, with its own figures. We are printing these because they are the Government’s own published figures for national schemes with no State variation, which is the one category of number this site does print. Where a figure differs by State, or where the portal itself flags one as awaiting update, we say so instead.
One caution about any list of this kind, including ours. Schemes are added, renamed, merged and revised, and this page is a description of what the Government published rather than a guarantee of what is on the platform the day you read it. The number fifteen and the names below come from the Government’s own release; the platform itself is where to check what is live.
The consolidation has a date: the e-Shram One-Stop Solution launched on 21 October 2024. The Government describes it as turning the platform into a unified service delivery system covering welfare, employment, skilling and pension services.
That date is useful for a specific reason. Anything written about this register before late 2024 describes a database, and anything written after describes a doorway. If advice you are being given treats the registration as an end in itself, it may simply be older than the change.
The Government also records that multilingual functionality covering 22 languages was introduced in 2025, which matters a great deal more to this register’s users than it would to most.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
The scheme is contributory, which is the other thing to understand before signing up. It is not an entitlement that arrives; it is a monthly contribution made over years, with a Government contribution alongside it. That is a commitment rather than a form, and it deserves a conversation at home rather than a decision at a counter.
The Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan-Dhan scheme is the old-age pension built for this category, and on the portal’s published conditions it is open to Indian citizens aged eighteen to forty who are unorganised workers with monthly income of fifteen thousand rupees or less, and who are not covered by the provident fund, State insurance or the national pension system.
What it pays, on the same source, is a monthly assured pension of three thousand rupees after the age of sixty, with the spouse receiving fifty per cent of the monthly pension on the pensioner’s death. The portal also records that where a couple joins together the figure is six thousand rupees monthly.
Read the age condition before anything else, because it is the one that disqualifies most of the people who want this. It closes at forty. For a worker already past that, this particular scheme is shut and the honest thing is to say so rather than to take money for an application that will fail.
There is a parallel scheme for small shopkeepers, traders and the self-employed. On the portal’s conditions it is open at ages eighteen to forty, where annual turnover is not more than one and a half crore rupees, and where the person is not covered by the provident fund, State insurance or the first pension scheme, paying the same three thousand rupees monthly after sixty.
The distinction between the two schemes is the kind of work rather than the generosity, and the turnover ceiling is high enough that most small traders fall inside it comfortably. A worker who is told they do not qualify for the first scheme because they run their own stall rather than working for a wage should be looking at this one instead of walking away.
The age ceiling of fifty is the thing to act on if you are near it. Unlike the pension schemes, where forty is a hard wall most readers of this page are already past, fifty is a line a great many working people are approaching and can still get in front of. Entry closes; it does not reopen.
The Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana is life cover, and on the portal’s figures it provides two lakh rupees on death from any cause, at a premium of four hundred and thirty-six rupees a year, for Indian citizens aged eighteen to fifty with a bank or Jan Dhan account linked to Aadhaar and consent to automatic debit.
Four hundred and thirty-six rupees is a figure worth translating. It is a little over a rupee a day, for two lakh rupees that would reach a family at the worst possible moment. For a household in this category that is among the highest-value rupees available to spend anywhere.
Whoever does take it should also deal with the thing that makes a death claim slow, which is not the policy but the paperwork around it — our pages on insurance nomination and the death certificate cover what a family will actually be asked for.
And one thing to settle at the moment of joining rather than afterwards: who the money is to reach. A life or accident cover with no nomination recorded, or one recorded in favour of somebody who has since died, turns a straightforward payment into a months-long exercise in establishing who the family is. Where no nomination exists the insurer will ask for proof of the heirs, which is what a legal heir certificate is for, and obtaining one after a death is far slower than naming a nominee before it.
The Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana is accident cover, and on the portal’s figures it provides two lakh rupees for accidental death and full disability and one lakh rupees for partial disability, at a premium of twenty rupees a year, for ages eighteen to seventy, on the same account conditions.
Twenty rupees a year. For a mason, a loader, a delivery rider, a farm worker or anybody else whose work carries physical risk, it is difficult to name anything else on this list with a better ratio, and the upper age of seventy makes it available to people the pension schemes have long since shut out.
The one thing to be honest about with any insurance, and we will say it even though it costs us the easier sale. Cover begins when you join. An injury that has already happened is not covered by a scheme joined afterwards, and anybody suggesting otherwise is setting a family up for a refusal. Where an injury has already occurred the questions are different ones — the employer’s liability, and the State board — and our employee compensation claim and disability certificate pages are the relevant reading.
The common thread in all three is that eligibility is assessed at the level of the household rather than the individual, which is why the descriptions talk about members and families rather than about workers. It also means the relevant document is usually one that establishes something about the household, and those are slow to obtain and worth having before anybody needs them.
Three more on the platform are household-level programmes rather than individual enrolments, and the portal sets out its own eligibility descriptions for each.
On food security the portal records entitlements of thirty-five kilograms of rice or wheat a month for eligible households, and fifteen kilograms monthly for households above the poverty line, the eligibility descriptions turning on indicators such as a household with no member aged fifteen to fifty-nine, a household with a disabled member, or casual labourers without permanent work. Our ration card page deals with the document side of that.
On rural housing the portal records assistance of one point two lakh rupees in plain areas and one point three lakh in hilly areas. And on old-age assistance it records a central contribution of three hundred to five hundred rupees depending on the age group, with a monthly pension described as one thousand to three thousand rupees depending on the State’s contribution — which is exactly why no single national figure can be given for it, and we give none.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Two of those eligibility descriptions turn on documents a household may not hold. A scheduled caste or scheduled tribe household will be asked for the certificate establishing it, and our caste certificate page covers obtaining one. Where a household falls outside those categories but is genuinely of low means, the economically weaker section route is the one that applies elsewhere, and our EWS certificate page deals with that. Neither is needed to register here; both are needed by schemes downstream, which is a good reason to get them while nothing is urgent.
Health cover on the platform is the Ayushman Bharat scheme, recorded on the portal as covering secondary and tertiary hospitalisation up to five lakh rupees, per family, in a year, with eligibility described by reference to household indicators including scheduled caste and scheduled tribe households and families with no male member aged sixteen to fifty-nine.
This is the one scheme on the list where a great many people wrongly believe themselves excluded, and it is also the one where the position has moved most since. Our Ayushman card page deals with it properly, including the three widespread beliefs that turn out to be wrong and the separate basis on which everybody over seventy now qualifies irrespective of income.
If you read only one other page after this one and you have a family, read that one. Hospitalisation is the event that turns a working household into an indebted one, and the cover is the single largest thing available on this list.
The remaining schemes on the portal’s listing are targeted at particular trades, and it is worth knowing they exist because a worker in one of them is usually looking in the wrong place.
| Who it is for | What the portal records |
|---|---|
| Street vendors | Working capital loans of up to ten thousand rupees, for vendors holding a vending certificate or identity document from an urban local body, or surveyed without one being issued, with incentives for timely repayment and digital transactions |
| Small and marginal farmers | A pension scheme at ages eighteen to forty with cultivable land up to two hectares, paying three thousand rupees a month, contributory with a matching Government contribution |
| Safai karamcharis and manual scavengers | Financial assistance for income-generating activities including sanitation, and support for education in India and abroad, through the dedicated corporation; the portal states no amounts |
| Anybody seeking skills training | A skill development programme open to any Indian citizen, with no amounts stated |
Note the last column on the vendor scheme. Holding the vending certificate is the gate, and being surveyed without one having been issued also counts — which is a genuinely useful detail for a vendor who was counted years ago and never given a document.
One of the schemes reachable from the platform is the rural employment guarantee, and anybody writing or reading about it needs to know that it is no longer the Act they are thinking of. Parliament has passed the Viksit Bharat — Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025, usually shortened to VB-G RAM G, and the Government describes it as replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act with a new statutory framework.
That matters here for a plain reason. A worker who registers on the database and then goes looking for the employment guarantee will be told about it by somebody using the old name, the old numbers, or both. The name has changed and so has the most important figure in it.
We are naming the Act and setting out only the features the Government has itself published. The assent date is not stated on the material we were able to read, and no commencement date is given there either, so neither appears on this page.
The figure almost everybody still quotes is a hundred days. Under the new Act the guarantee is one hundred and twenty-five days of wage employment per rural household in each financial year, for households whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work.
Twenty-five extra days is not a rounding change for a household living on that work. It is most of a month of wages, and a family that plans on a hundred days because that is the number they have always heard will stop asking at the wrong point.
Twenty-five days is also, read the other way, the clearest answer available to a question workers ask constantly, which is whether anything about this scheme has actually improved. Something has, by a measurable amount, and it is worth knowing when somebody tells you nothing ever changes.
The new framework also carries something the old one did not, and of everything here it is likeliest to catch a worker out: the Government’s own description records a sixty-day period during peak sowing and harvesting seasons in which work is not provided.
The logic is agricultural rather than administrative. Those are the weeks when farm labour is most in demand and best paid, and the guarantee is not meant to compete with it. But for a household that budgets around the guarantee, sixty days is a gap better planned around than stumbled into.
What this page does not do is tell you which sixty days apply where you live, because that is not a national answer. It will follow the agricultural calendar of the State, and the State is where to ask.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Where work is applied for and not provided, the Government’s description records that a daily unemployment allowance becomes payable after fifteen days, with the liability resting on the States and with rates and conditions left to be prescribed by rules.
Three things in that sentence are worth separating, because each one is a question a worker will have to ask locally. The allowance begins after fifteen days, not immediately. It is the State that pays it, not the Centre. And the amount sits in the rules, not in the Act.
So the one thing to do is the one thing people skip. Apply in writing, and keep proof of the date you applied. Fifteen days have to run from something, and an application nobody can date is an application that never started the clock.
On payment, the Government’s description is specific and useful: daily wages are to be paid weekly, or at the latest not later than a fortnight after the date on which the work was done.
That is a sentence worth memorising, because delayed wages are the commonest grievance on this kind of work and the commonest response is that nothing can be done. Something can be asked, and asking is easier when the person asking knows the outer limit is a fortnight.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
It is also the answer to a question we would otherwise be asked about this page. A fortnight is the outer limit for the wage; the fifteen days before an allowance begins is a different period doing a different job. Two fifteens in the same scheme is confusing, and they are not the same fifteen.
Here is something we noticed while checking this page, and we are reporting it rather than quietly working around it. The scheme listing on the portal itself still describes the employment guarantee in the older terms: it states work within fifteen days of applying, subject to one hundred days per household per year, and against the wage rate it carries a note recording that the rate has been increased and is to be incorporated.
So on this one scheme the Act and the portal page do not say the same thing. That is not a scandal; a portal listing fifteen schemes will lag a new Act, and the portal says so about the wage figure in its own words. But it does mean a worker reading the portal will come away with the older number.
What this tells you about every figure on every portal. A scheme page is a summary maintained by people, and an Act is the law. Where they differ, the Act governs and the page will catch up. Where you are about to rely on a number, the question worth asking is not whether the page looks official but when it was last revised.
For the guarantee itself, the Act. One hundred and twenty-five days is the figure Parliament has enacted, and a hundred days is the figure a summary has not yet updated.
For the wage rate, neither, and this is where we stop. The rate is revised, it differs by State, and the portal itself records that the figure shown there is awaiting incorporation. We print no wage rate on this page for exactly that reason, and anybody who quotes you a single national daily wage for this work is quoting something that does not exist.
For the allowance, the State’s rules. The Act creates the entitlement after fifteen days; what is paid is prescribed below it.
For the guarantee itself, then, the position is simple enough to state in one line: rely on the Act for the days, on the State for the rate and the allowance, and on a dated application for the clock.
There is a second change of law sitting underneath all of this, and it is the reason unorganised should be read as a defined category and not as a loose description.
The Central Government brought all four labour codes into force with effect from 21 November 2025, rationalising twenty-nine central labour laws. Among the laws the Code on Social Security, 2020 subsumes is the Unorganised Workers Social Security Act, 2008 — the statute that gave the category its original legal shape.
Code on Social Security, 2020, in force from 21 November 2025. On the Government’s own published mapping the Code subsumes nine earlier enactments, among them the Unorganised Workers Social Security Act, 2008, the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
That is worth noticing precisely because two of those — provident fund and State insurance — are the memberships that put a worker outside the unorganised category. The definition and the disqualification now sit in the same Code.
Our guide to the provident fund registration side deals with what happens when an establishment crosses into that territory, which is the other end of the same question.
A good deal of what a registered worker actually receives is delivered by a State rather than by the Centre, and it helps to know which parts those are so that you ask the right office.
The welfare board registration is a State register with its own card, its own proof-of-work requirement and its own benefits, and it is a separate thing from this database. Our labour card page deals with it, and a worker who should be on both is better off doing them together because the documents overlap.
The unemployment allowance under the new employment Act is a State liability on the Government’s own description.
The old-age assistance programmes top up a central contribution with a State one, which is why the monthly figure differs from State to State.
Public distribution entitlements are administered through the State, and our ration card page covers that side.
Construction workers’ data is shared with States and Union Territories from this database, which is one of the few places where registering here feeds a State process directly.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Registration on the portal is free. We should say that in the same breath as our own price, because the two sit next to each other and a reader is entitled to see them together.
This service is listed at ₹299, turnaround Same day – 3 days. What that pays for is a person doing it with you and getting the details right the first time. What it is not is a fee for the card, because there is no fee for the card.
And if you would rather not pay it, that is a reasonable choice and we will say so. A worker with an Aadhaar-linked mobile and twenty quiet minutes can do this themselves on the portal, for nothing. If that describes you, do it yourself. The people this is actually worth paying for are the ones whose mobile is not linked, whose name does not match across documents, or who have tried once and been stopped by something they could not read.
And if at the end of the checking stage the answer is that you are not eligible at all, we say so and that is where it stops. A registration we know will not stand is not something we will make for a fee, and the honest version of this service includes being told no.
| Stage | What is done | Whose work |
|---|---|---|
| Checking | Whether you are eligible at all, and whether anything in your records will stop the registration before it is attempted | Us |
| Reconciling | Differences between the name, date of birth and address on your Aadhaar and on everything else, identified before filing rather than after a failure | Us, with your documents |
| Registering | The registration itself, through the route that fits your situation | Us, with you present |
| Recording | The number written down for you in a form your family can use, with a copy kept | Us |
| Pointing | Which of the schemes on the platform you appear to qualify for, and what joining each one actually requires | Us |
| Afterwards | Keeping the record current when your work, address or phone changes | You, and us if you ask |
Notice what is not in that table: any scheme benefit. We can tell you which schemes you look eligible for and what each needs. Enrolling in a pension or an insurance scheme is a separate act, with its own form and in two cases its own annual premium, and nobody can enrol you in it by registering you here.
Register somebody in a category of work they do not do. The occupation recorded is what schemes and State processes read later. Putting down construction because somebody said construction workers get more is a false entry in a Government database, and it is the person registered who carries it.
Register a person who is an EPFO or ESIC member. That is a disqualification, not a technicality, and a registration made over it is not worth having.
Use somebody else’s mobile number as the worker’s. It is the number every later message goes to, including from schemes. An agent’s number on a worker’s record is how workers lose access to their own file.
Promise a benefit to get the registration done. Not ours to promise and not true.
Charge for a renewal. There is no renewal. If we ever send you a renewal invoice for this, it is a mistake and you should refuse it.
Money. Registration pays nothing. Everything that pays is a separate scheme with its own conditions.
Eligibility for a particular scheme. We can read the conditions against what you tell us. The scheme decides.
A date for anything downstream. The registration itself is quick. What a State office or a scheme does afterwards is theirs.
That a benefit you were refused will be granted on appeal. We do not run scheme appeals and we will not suggest otherwise.
A wage figure, an allowance figure, or a State-wise list. Those are revised, they differ by State, and in one case the portal itself says its figure is awaiting update.
Place Order — no advance, pay after work
Registering, correcting a record and explaining what a scheme requires is documentation, and that is what is described here.
A dispute is not. A refused claim, a benefit withheld, an employer who denies that the work was done, a compensation claim after an injury: those are contested matters, and where one needs a court or a tribunal it is conducted by an advocate whom you engage and pay directly. Our employee compensation claim page deals with the documentation side of an injury matter, and says where that line falls too.
Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly; we do not quote, collect or share it
Three things, and they take an afternoon between them.
Check that your mobile number is the one linked to your Aadhaar. That single fact decides whether you can register from your own phone or have to walk into a centre, and it is checkable before you start rather than after you fail. If it is not linked, our Aadhaar update page covers getting that right, and it is worth doing in any case because a great many other things run through it.
Then register, and write the number down somewhere a family member can find it. Not only on a phone.
Then, separately, look at the schemes. That is the part that pays, and it is the part people never get to because they believe the card did it.
If you are not registered and the reason is that somebody once told you it was pointless, the two things to weigh are these: it costs nothing, and it is the mechanism fifteen schemes use to find people. Twenty minutes against that is not a close call.
Take the card out and check three things against reality: the mobile number, the address, and the occupation. All three drift, and all three are what a scheme or a State office will read.
Then ask the question almost nobody asks after registering: which of the schemes on the platform have I actually joined? If the answer is none, the registration has so far done exactly what it was designed to do and no more, and the next step is a separate one. Pension if you are under forty-one. Insurance if you have a bank account, at a cost per year most people would spend on a single meal out. Health cover without enrolling at all, if the household qualifies, and our Ayushman card page takes that up.
The one sentence worth repeating to anybody who has the card. Being on the list is not the same as being in a scheme. The list is how the schemes find you; joining one is still something you have to do.
Send your name as it appears on Aadhaar, the kind of work you do, and whether your mobile is Aadhaar-linked. You will get a straight answer on eligibility, on which schemes look open to you, and on whether you need us at all.
If only three sentences survive this page, let them be the ones that save money: registration is free, the card never expires, and nobody can enrol you in a scheme by registering you here.
A free registration that pays nothing is still worth twenty minutes, because every scheme that does pay is looking at that list to find people. Just do not stop there, and do not pay anybody for the card itself.
This page is built on the material published by the Ministry of Labour and Employment for the e-Shram portal and on the Press Information Bureau release of 25 August 2026 marking five years of the portal. On what the database is, the release describes it as the country’s first Aadhaar-authenticated National Database of Unorganised Workers, launched on 26 August 2021, recording 31.89 crore registrations on figures as at 18 August 2026. On eligibility it states that any worker aged sixteen years and above engaged in the unorganised sector is eligible to register, and that a worker must not be an income tax-payer or a member of the Employees Provident Fund Organisation or of the Employees State Insurance Corporation. On the profile of registrants it records, as on 20 August 2026, that 0.08 per cent are aged 16 to 18, 55.21 per cent are aged 18 to 40, 24.18 per cent are aged 40 to 50 and 20.53 per cent are above 50, and that women account for 54.28 per cent of registered workers against 45.72 per cent men, the highest registrations coming from agriculture, domestic and household work, construction and apparel. It records that registration requires an Aadhaar number for Aadhaar eKYC and a mobile number preferably linked with Aadhaar, that registration is completely free of cost, that the database enables sharing of construction workers’ data with States and Union Territories, and that multilingual functionality covering 22 languages was introduced in 2025.
On the platform as a single point of access, the release records the launch of the e-Shram One-Stop Solution on 21 October 2024, bringing together fifteen social security and welfare schemes on one platform, naming among them the Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan-Dhan Yojana, the Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana, the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, the National Social Assistance Programme, One Nation One Ration Card and the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana — Gramin.
On the portal’s own answers to common questions, the published Frequently Asked Questions state that the Universal Account Number is a twelve-digit number uniquely assigned to each unorganised worker after registration and does not change once assigned; that registration on the portal is totally free; that a worker whose mobile number is not linked to Aadhaar may register at a Common Service Centre or State Seva Kendra using biometric authentication; that there are no income criteria for registering and no educational qualification is required; that members of the Employees State Insurance Corporation or the Employees Provident Fund Organisation are not unorganised workers; that the card never expires and does not need renewing, though details should be kept current; that the photograph is taken from Aadhaar, so changing it means updating Aadhaar and completing Aadhaar re-eKYC on the portal; and that a worker who moves into the organised sector is entitled only to benefits for organised-sector workers.
On the two statements about income, the portal’s Frequently Asked Questions state that there are no income criteria for registering, while the Press Information Bureau release states that a worker must not be an income tax-payer. Both are Government statements and this page sets out both. On the face of it what separates them is a monetary threshold, of which neither source states one, and status as an income-tax payer, which the release treats as a disqualification. That reading is offered as the distinction between the two statements and not as a rule either source has announced.
On the schemes reachable from the platform, the figures and conditions set out on this page are those published on the portal’s own scheme listing, including for the Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan-Dhan Yojana an eligibility of ages 18 to 40 with monthly income of fifteen thousand rupees or less and no coverage under the Employees Provident Fund Organisation, the Employees State Insurance Corporation or the National Pension System, against a monthly assured pension of three thousand rupees after the age of sixty with fifty per cent to the spouse on death; for the pension scheme for traders and the self-employed, ages 18 to 40 with annual turnover not more than one and a half crore rupees, against the same monthly pension; for the Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, ages 18 to 50 and cover of two lakh rupees on death from any cause at a premium of four hundred and thirty-six rupees a year; for the Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana, ages 18 to 70 and cover of two lakh rupees for accidental death or full disability and one lakh rupees for partial disability at a premium of twenty rupees a year; for the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana — Gramin, assistance of one point two lakh rupees in plain areas and one point three lakh rupees in hilly areas; and for PM SVANidhi, working capital loans of up to ten thousand rupees for street vendors holding a vending certificate or identity document from an urban local body, or surveyed without one being issued.
On the rural employment guarantee, the Government’s own published material records the Viksit Bharat — Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025, described as replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act with a new statutory framework, guaranteeing one hundred and twenty-five days of wage employment per rural household in each financial year for households whose adult members volunteer for unskilled manual work, with a sixty-day period during peak sowing and harvesting seasons in which work is not provided, a daily unemployment allowance payable after fifteen days with the liability resting on the States and rates and conditions to be prescribed by rules, and daily wages to be paid weekly or at the latest not later than a fortnight after the date on which the work was done. The portal’s own scheme listing still describes this scheme as providing work within fifteen days subject to one hundred days per household per year, and carries against the wage rate a note that the rate has been increased and is to be incorporated. Both are recorded here as they stand.
On the statutory home of the category, the Central Government brought all four labour codes into force with effect from 21 November 2025, rationalising twenty-nine central labour laws, and on its own published mapping the Code on Social Security, 2020 subsumes the Unorganised Workers Social Security Act, 2008 together with the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959, the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the Cine-Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1981 and the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996.
On what this page deliberately withholds, no daily wage rate is given for the rural employment guarantee, no figure is given for the unemployment allowance, and no State-wise list is given for the old-age assistance monthly amount. The first is revised and differs by State and the portal itself records its figure as awaiting incorporation; the second is prescribed by State rules; the third depends on a State contribution added to a central one. No assent or commencement date is given for the Act of 2025, neither being stated in the material read for this page.
Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly; we do not quote, collect or share it
Two doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
Would rather not pick anybody? Tell us the matter instead — one form goes to every advocate at once, and the first to take it up calls you.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates