A board resolution looks like the simplest document a company ever produces: half a page, a name, an authority. It is also the document most often produced the wrong way — passed by circulation when the Act requires a meeting, signed without quorum, silent about an interested director, or filed with the Registrar when no filing was needed. None of that shows at the time. All of it shows later, when a lender, a buyer’s advocate or an auditor goes through the file.
A company is a person in law but it has no hands. Everything it does, it does through people, and the body that decides what those people may do is the board of directors. A board resolution is the record of one of those decisions.
That is worth saying plainly because of what follows from it. The resolution is not the transaction. It is the authority for the transaction. When a bank asks for a resolution before it opens an account, it is not collecting paperwork — it is satisfying itself that the person signing the forms was authorised by the company to sign them. When a court registry asks for one, it is checking that the person filing has standing to file for the company.
Which means a resolution is judged by whether it does that job. A beautifully typed page that does not identify the person, or does not say precisely what they may do, or was passed in a way the Act does not permit, fails at exactly the moment it is needed.
| Situation | Who asks for it | Must it be at a meeting? |
|---|---|---|
| Opening a bank account, changing signatories | The bank | Not by itself, but banks usually prefer a meeting resolution |
| Borrowing money, availing a facility | The lender | Yes — Section 179(3) |
| Giving a guarantee or security for a loan | The lender | Yes — Section 179(3) |
| Investing the company’s funds | Auditor, counterparty | Yes — Section 179(3) |
| Issuing shares or debentures | Registrar, subscriber | Yes — Section 179(3) |
| Approving the financial statement and Board’s report | Auditor, Registrar | Yes — Section 179(3) |
| Authorising a person to sign an agreement | The counterparty | No |
| Authorising a person to appear before a tax or regulatory authority | That authority | No |
| Authorising somebody to act in litigation | The court registry | No |
| Appointment or resignation of a director, shifting the registered office | Registrar | Usually at a meeting, and often with shareholder approval too |
The third column is the one to read before you decide how to pass it.
This provision decides more resolutions than any other, and most people have never read it.
Section 179(3), Companies Act, 2013 (in substance).
The Board of Directors of a company shall exercise the following powers only by means of resolutions passed at meetings of the Board —
(a) to make calls on shareholders in respect of money unpaid on their shares;
(b) to authorise buy-back of securities;
(c) to issue securities, including debentures, whether in or outside India;
(d) to borrow monies;
(e) to invest the funds of the company;
(f) to grant loans or give guarantee or provide security in respect of loans;
(g) to approve financial statement and the Board’s report;
(h) to diversify the business of the company;
(i) to approve amalgamation, merger or reconstruction;
(j) to take over a company or acquire a controlling or substantial stake in another company;
(k) any other matter which may be prescribed.
Note clause (k). The rules made under the Act add further matters to that list, so the statutory eleven is a floor rather than a ceiling. Note also the proviso to the section, which allows the Board to delegate certain of these powers — borrowing, investing and granting loans — to a committee, the managing director, the manager or another principal officer, by a resolution passed at a meeting. So even the delegation has to be done at a meeting.
The practical consequence is simple and it catches companies constantly. A term loan is sanctioned, somebody circulates a resolution for signature because getting three directors into a room is inconvenient, and the file now contains a document that is not a valid exercise of the borrowing power. Nobody notices — until due diligence, or a dispute about whether the borrowing was authorised.
For everything outside that list, circulation is a perfectly proper mechanism, and for a small company it is often the sensible one. But it has two conditions that are routinely ignored.
Section 175, Companies Act, 2013 (in substance).
No resolution shall be deemed to have been duly passed by the Board or by a committee by circulation unless the resolution has been circulated in draft, together with the necessary papers, to all the directors, or members of the committee, at their addresses registered with the company, and has been approved by a majority of them as are entitled to vote on the resolution.
Provided that where not less than one-third of the total number of directors for the time being require that any resolution under circulation must be decided at a meeting, the chairperson shall put the resolution to be decided at a meeting of the Board.
A resolution passed by circulation shall be noted at a subsequent meeting of the Board or the committee and made part of the minutes of that meeting.
Three things to take from that. It must go to all the directors, at their registered addresses, in draft, with the papers. A one-third block can force it into a meeting. And it is not finished when the last director signs — it has to be noted in the minutes of a later meeting, and companies forget this step almost universally.
Order a board resolution — free, pay after work
Section 174(1) fixes the quorum for a Board meeting at one-third of the total strength of the Board, or two directors, whichever is higher, and any fraction in that one-third is rounded up to one.
So a board of three needs two. A board of five needs two. A board of seven needs three. And a board of two needs both — which is the case for a great many private limited companies, and which means that in a two-director company there is no such thing as a Board meeting attended by one person.
Section 174 also deals with what happens when the number of interested directors reduces the remaining directors below quorum — the remaining directors, not being less than two, may act for the purpose of increasing the number of directors or of calling a general meeting. And where a meeting could not be held for want of quorum, unless the articles say otherwise, it stands adjourned to the same day in the next week at the same time and place.
Section 173(1), Companies Act, 2013 (in substance).
Every company shall hold the first meeting of the Board of Directors within thirty days of the date of its incorporation, and thereafter hold a minimum number of four meetings of its Board every year, in such a manner that not more than one hundred and twenty days shall intervene between two consecutive meetings of the Board.
Two numbers, both absolute: four in a year, and never more than 120 days apart. A company that holds all four in December has not complied, because the gap rule is separate from the count rule.
Meetings are called on notice — the Act requires at least seven days’ notice in writing to every director, at the registered address, by hand, post or electronic means, with provision for a meeting at shorter notice to transact urgent business subject to the conditions the Act specifies. Where notice was short, say so in the minutes rather than leaving it to be inferred.
The Act does not apply the full calendar to the smallest companies.
Section 173(5), Companies Act, 2013 (in substance).
A One Person Company, small company, dormant company and a private company that is a start-up shall be deemed to have complied with the provisions of this section if at least one meeting of the Board has been conducted in each half of a calendar year and the gap between the two meetings is not less than ninety days. This shall not apply to a One Person Company in which there is only one director.
And for the single-director One Person Company, Section 122 supplies the answer: where there is only one director, it is sufficient that the resolution is entered in the minutes book, signed and dated by the director, and that date is deemed to be the date of the meeting for all purposes under the Act.
So a one-director OPC does not hold meetings — but it does keep a minutes book, and the resolution still has to be recorded, signed and dated. Skipping the book because there is nobody to meet is a different mistake from skipping the meeting.
Section 173(2) permits directors to participate in a Board meeting in person or through video conferencing or other audio-visual means, as may be prescribed, which are capable of recording and recognising the participation of the directors and of recording and storing the proceedings of the meeting along with the date and time.
There were historically restrictions on dealing with certain items — approval of the financial statement, the Board’s report, the prospectus, audit committee matters and approval of a merger or takeover — through video conferencing, and the rules on this have been amended over time. Rather than print a position that may have moved, we confirm the current rule for the specific item before advising on it.
What does not change is the record. Where a director participates remotely, the minutes should say so, name the director, and record that the participation was capable of being recorded as required. Minutes that describe everybody as present in a room when two people were on a call are inaccurate minutes, and inaccurate minutes are a statutory problem rather than a cosmetic one.
Section 184(2) requires every director who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, concerned or interested in a contract or arrangement entered into or to be entered into with a body corporate or a firm or other entity in which the director has the prescribed interest, to disclose the nature of that interest at the Board meeting in which the contract or arrangement is discussed, and not to participate in such meeting.
The drafting consequence is a single sentence that should appear in the resolution itself, and usually does not: that the interested director disclosed the nature of the interest, did not participate in the discussion or vote on that item, and that quorum was present without counting that director where the rules so require.
Without it, the resolution is silent on a statutory requirement that was either met or not met, and silence is not evidence of compliance. With it, the point is closed on the face of the document.
The resolution is the decision. The minutes are the record of the meeting at which it was taken, and the Act treats the record seriously.
This is the point on which we are asked for a second opinion more than any other in this area, usually because two advisers have said opposite things.
Section 117 requires a copy of every resolution of a description specified in Section 117(3) to be filed with the Registrar in the prescribed form within the prescribed period, and Form MGT-14 is that form. One of the descriptions in Section 117(3) is resolutions passed in pursuance of Section 179(3) — that is, the meeting-only list above.
Two cautions, because this is exactly the kind of point that goes stale. First, the exemption is attached to that clause, not to Section 117 as a whole — other resolutions listed in Section 117(3) are still filed by private companies. Second, exemption notifications have conditions, and a company in default of its filing obligations may not be able to rely on them. We check the position for your company rather than assuming it.
Nobody outside the company sees the minutes book. What they take instead is a certified true copy, and getting its format right is most of what a bank or a registrar is actually assessing.
A usable certified true copy states all of the following:
Two practical notes. Banks almost always want the specimen signature of the authorised person attested on the same document, and a copy without it comes straight back. And where the authority is meant to continue, say so — “until revoked by the Board” — rather than leaving the institution to wonder whether the authority expired with the transaction.
Most resolutions we are asked to fix fail on the same three things: they do not identify the person precisely, they do not say exactly what the person may do, and they do not state the limit.
| Weak | Why it fails | Better |
|---|---|---|
| “Resolved that the company may open a bank account.” | No bank, no branch, nobody authorised | Names the bank and branch, names the signatories, states the mode of operation |
| “Mr X is authorised to do all necessary acts.” | Unbounded authority nobody will accept at face value | Lists what he may do, and states the ceiling and the period |
| “Resolved to take a loan.” | No lender, no amount, no security described | Names the lender, the facility, the amount, the security and who may sign |
| “The board approves the agreement.” | Which agreement, with whom, dated when? | Identifies the counterparty and the document, and authorises a named person to execute it |
A useful discipline when drafting: read the resolution as though you were the bank officer who has never met anybody in the company. If you could not tell from the page who is authorised and how far the authority goes, it needs another draft.
The most frequently requested resolution of all, and the one most often returned by the branch. What banks generally look for:
When the signatories change later, do not amend the old resolution — pass a fresh one that expressly revokes the earlier authority and substitutes the new one, and deliver it to the branch. A superseded signatory who was never formally removed is a real operational risk, not a paperwork quibble.
Where a company sues, defends, files a complaint or appears before an authority, the person acting for it has to be authorised, and registries check this. A resolution for that purpose should name the person, describe the proceeding or the class of proceedings, and state what the person may do — sign and verify pleadings, engage advocates, swear affidavits, appear, and give evidence where required.
Two things worth getting right. Make the authority wide enough to cover the whole matter rather than a single step, so that a fresh resolution is not needed at every stage. And where the authority is for a specific case, identify the case; where it is general, say so, and be aware that some forums prefer a specific authorisation.
The company still needs an advocate to conduct the matter — a resolution authorises a person to act for the company, it does not give that person a right of audience. Our directory is free to search and we take no commission.
| Board resolution | Shareholders’ resolution | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed by | The directors | The members, in general meeting |
| Where | At a Board meeting, or by circulation where permitted | At an annual or extraordinary general meeting, or by postal ballot where allowed |
| Majority | A majority of directors present and voting | Simple majority for an ordinary resolution; at least three times the votes in favour as against, for a special resolution |
| Typical matters | Day-to-day management, banking, borrowing within limits, authorising signatories | Altering the articles, changing the name or objects, and the matters the Act reserves to members |
| If you use the wrong one | The decision is not authorised — and the defect is structural, not clerical | |
Several transactions need both, in sequence, and in the right order. Where a shareholders’ approval is required, the Board first approves and calls the general meeting; the members then pass their resolution; and only then does the company act.
An LLP has no board of directors and therefore passes no board resolutions. Decisions are taken by the partners, in the manner the LLP agreement provides, and what a bank or an authority asks for is an authorisation or resolution of the designated partners in that form. A partnership firm works similarly, through the partnership deed and an authority letter or partners’ resolution.
The mistake to avoid is asking for “a board resolution” from an entity that has no board, and then producing a document that describes a meeting that could not have happened. Tell us the entity type and what the institution asked for, and we will draft the thing that actually fits. We also handle the underlying registrations — private limited and LLP — if the entity does not exist yet.
The request comes up constantly: a decision was taken months ago, nobody recorded it, and now a bank or an auditor wants a resolution dated back then.
Do not. The minutes book has consecutively numbered pages and a sequence; the resolution will sit alongside other entries with their own dates; the bank’s own file has dates; and the statutory provisions on minutes treat the record as something that is kept, not something that is reconstructed. A date that does not fit is precisely what somebody looking for a problem will find.
The honest alternative works and takes ten minutes: pass a resolution today that records what was decided and when, and ratifies and confirms the acts done pursuant to it. That is a normal, unremarkable corporate step. It tells the truth, it closes the gap, and it does not put anybody in a position they cannot explain.
A resolution is drafted in Same day – 2 days. The part that takes judgment is the question before the drafting: can this decision be taken the way you propose to take it, does it need a meeting, does it need shareholders as well, and does it need a filing.
| What | Paid to | Typical timing |
|---|---|---|
| Drafting, from ₹900 | Us, after the work is done | Same day – 2 days |
| Notice, minutes and attendance record, where you want the full set | Us | Same turnaround |
| Registrar filing fee, where a filing is required | The Ministry portal | Within the prescribed period |
| Notarisation or apostille, where the document goes abroad | Notary or the authority | Add time for it |
We do not mark up government fees. Nothing is payable in advance — placing the order is free, we check how the decision has to be taken before we draft anything, and payment comes after the work is done.
Those two answers decide whether it needs a meeting or can be circulated, what the resolution has to say, whether a filing follows, and what the certified true copy must contain for the bank or registrar to accept it first time.
Two doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates