People put their most irreplaceable possessions into a locker under a quiet assumption that the bank now has them, in the way it has their money. It does not, and it never claimed to. What the bank provides is a steel box in a strongroom and the security around it; what goes into that box is looked at by nobody, recorded by nobody and verified by nobody. That one fact is not a complaint about banks — it is simply what the arrangement is — but almost everything practical about lockers follows from it. Because nobody else knows what is inside, your own list and your own photographs are the only record that will ever exist. Because the locker is a separate arrangement from your account, the nomination on it is a separate nomination, made on a different form, often years apart, and the assumption that one covers the other is the single most expensive mistake in this subject. And because it is a contract rather than a deposit, the document you signed at the counter actually governs everything — who may open it, what happens if the rent quietly stops leaving your account, and what the bank may do if it hears nothing from you for years. Almost none of that is difficult. It is just never done.
Worth stating plainly at the start because almost every misunderstanding later grows out of it.
When you deposit money, the bank has your money and owes it back to you. The relationship is about an amount. When you hire a locker, the bank has given you the use of a cabinet in a secured room. The relationship is about a space.
So the bank is not holding your things in the way it holds your money. It is providing a facility, under a contract, with security around it. What you put in the space is your business and remains your business, including the business of knowing what it is.
Nobody hides this. It is in the agreement, and any branch will confirm it if asked. It simply does not match the picture most people carry in their heads when they walk out of a strongroom feeling that their things are now somewhere very safe.
Three consequences run through the rest of this page. No record of the contents exists unless you make one. The contract you signed decides the questions that arise later. And the arrangement has to be kept alive — rent paid, details current, the locker occasionally used — because it is a continuing relationship rather than a completed act.
It knows that you hold a locker, which one, since when, who may operate it, whether the rent is paid and when the locker was last accessed. That is a real and useful record, and you can ask for it.
It does not know what is inside. It did not look when you put anything in, it does not maintain a list, and it does not verify anything. The strongroom is watched; the inside of your box is not.
This is why a question families ask constantly has no good answer: can the bank tell us what is in it? No. It can tell you that the locker exists, and it can open it under its own procedure when the circumstances for that arise, and at that point what is there is what is there.
So the record is yours to make. Not because anybody doubts you, but because in a few years the only people who can say what was in that box will be people relying on memory, and memory about objects and dates is unreliable in a way nobody believes until it matters.
It is handed over at a counter with several other forms and most people sign it in the way one signs things at counters. It is, in fact, the document that decides everything on this page.
Six things to find in it, with a pen, and none of them takes long.
Who may operate the locker, and on what instruction.
What the bank undertakes, and in what terms it describes what it is not undertaking.
The rent, how it is charged, and what happens when it is not paid.
In what circumstances the bank may open the locker itself, and what notice is involved.
What happens on the death of a hirer, and how nomination fits into it.
What happens if a key is lost, and at whose cost.
Then ask for a copy of the signed agreement. This sounds obvious and is routinely not done, and a hirer who cannot produce their own agreement is in a weak position in any conversation about it. Keep it with your papers — not, for reasons that should now be obvious, in the locker.
A locker may be hired by one person or by more than one together, and where more than one, there is a choice to make that most people make without noticing.
Either of you may operate it alone — convenient, and it means that if one of you is unavailable the locker is still reachable.
All of you must attend together — more controlled, and it means that if one of you is unavailable, nobody can open it.
Neither is right in general; they suit different situations. What is certainly wrong is not knowing which one you have, and a striking number of joint hirers do not.
Two practical points that only appear later. The instruction affects what happens when one hirer dies as well as when one is simply away, so think about it in those terms rather than only in terms of convenience. And where an elderly parent hires jointly with an adult child for practical reasons, be clear within the family about what that is for — access is not ownership, and an arrangement made for convenience is sometimes read afterwards as something more.
Our joint account documentation service deals with the equivalent choice on accounts, which is the same decision in a different place and is very often made inconsistently with this one.
If this page is worth anything, it is worth this section.
They are separate records. They are made on separate forms. They are frequently made years apart, by somebody being handed a form at a counter, without anyone ever explaining that these are two different things. And one does not imply, update or override the other.
So a person can have thought about this carefully for their bank account, named exactly the right person, and left the locker — which contains the things they cared most about — with no nomination at all, or with a nomination naming somebody chosen in a different decade.
The fix costs a morning. Ask the branch, in writing, to confirm the nomination position on every account and every locker you hold. Read what comes back. Where it is wrong or missing, correct it while you are sitting there.
And extend the check. Policies carry their own nominations, on their own forms, made at their own times — our insurance nomination documentation service deals with those. Investments carry theirs. The general rule is that every arrangement carries its own nomination and none of them talk to each other, which is exactly why they drift apart.
It tells the bank whom it may deal with about the locker if the hirer dies. That is its purpose: to stop the contents being stranded while a family works out its position.
It does not decide who owns what comes out. Ownership is settled by succession and by any will, and the bank neither decides that nor claims to. So a nominee who is also the only person entitled has nothing further to think about; a nominee who is one of several has access to things that may have to be accounted for.
Our deceased depositor guide sets that distinction out at length in the context of accounts, and every word of it applies here. It is worth reading once, calmly, before anybody needs it.
The practical instruction that follows: make sure your nomination and your will are not telling different stories. They answer different questions, so they are not the same document and one is not a substitute for the other — but where they point in opposite directions, the family is left holding an argument. Our will drafting guide explains why having a nomination is not having a will.
A nomination is not a decision taken once. It is a small form that should be revisited whenever the facts behind it change, and the occasions are entirely predictable.
A marriage. A birth. A death, including the death of the nominee. A separation or an estrangement. A move that changes who is nearby and available. And the simple passage of a decade, in which a great deal changes without any single event.
Two things when you do change one. Get an acknowledgement of the change and keep it with your agreement, because an uncorroborated belief that you changed something years ago is not a record. And do all of them at once — account, locker, policies, investments — because changing one and intending to get to the others is how the drift starts again.
Where a nomination involves a child, an adult is ordinarily named alongside to act on the child’s behalf. That adult is the part people forget to revisit, and it is often the part that has aged worst.
The commonest way a locker arrangement quietly goes wrong, and it is almost never a refusal to pay.
Rent is generally taken from an account by a standing instruction, which is set up once and then forgotten, which is the point of it. Then the account changes — a balance runs low, a branch merges, an account is closed in favour of a newer one, particulars are updated somewhere and not somewhere else — and the instruction stops working. Nothing announces this. Nobody telephones about a small amount.
What the agreement provides for unpaid rent is in the agreement, and the consequences escalate over time rather than arriving at once. Read your own rather than relying on a summary, and understand it before it is relevant rather than after.
The prevention is one line: know which account the rent leaves from, and check it after any change to that account. That is the whole of it, and it is the same habit that prevents an insurance policy lapsing, for the same reason.
If you find rent has gone unpaid, deal with it immediately and in writing rather than at your next convenient visit. Almost everything in this area is straightforward while it is recent.
It can happen, in circumstances the agreement and the framework the bank works under define, and it is worth understanding without alarm.
It is a procedure rather than a decision somebody takes at a desk. There is notice, there is a documented process, and it is not done casually. What differs between situations is the circumstance that triggers it and what the process requires.
This page prints no periods and no particulars because they differ and they change, and a wrong number here would mislead somebody about something that matters. Read what your own agreement says about it, and ask the branch if it is not clear.
Two things you control, and they are the only two that matter. Keep the rent paid. And keep your contact details current with the branch, because notice reaches the address the bank holds, and an address from three houses ago is how people are not notified about things they were notified about.
Where you are away for an extended period, tell the branch in writing and give it a way to reach you. It costs a letter.
People assume that a locker left untouched for fifteen years is the safest kind. From the bank’s side, it is the kind that raises a question.
The reasoning is ordinary rather than suspicious. A facility nobody has used for a very long time may belong to somebody who has died, moved, forgotten it or lost the keys, and an institution holding such a facility has to have a way of dealing with that. So long inactivity is noticed, and the arrangement may be treated differently as a result.
The answer is simple and it costs an hour a year: operate the locker occasionally. A visit counts even if you take nothing out and put nothing in.
And there is a better reason to visit than the administrative one. A visit is when you check your own list against what is actually in the box, update the photographs, and notice anything that has changed. An inventory that is never checked slowly becomes a historical document.
Our dormant account reactivation service deals with the equivalent problem on accounts, which is a close cousin of this one and frequently turns up in the same family at the same time.
A locker ordinarily opens on two keys operated together — yours, and the bank’s — which is why neither party can open it alone and why the arrangement works as it does.
Your key is your responsibility and there is usually only the one set. Three sensible habits: keep it somewhere you would keep a document rather than somewhere you would keep a household key; do not label it in a way that identifies the bank or the locker; and do not hand it to anybody as an informal arrangement, because a key handed over is not an authority to operate and the gap between those two things is exactly where trouble sits.
If a key is lost, tell the bank at once, in writing. Not at your next visit. The procedure involves the lock being dealt with and a fresh arrangement made, ordinarily at your cost, and it is scheduled rather than immediate.
Telling the bank late is the only part of this that makes it materially worse, and it is what people do, because reporting it makes it real.
Where a key is not lost but a hirer cannot attend, that is a different problem with a different answer — see the section below on somebody else operating the locker. Do not solve it by posting a key to a relative.
Handled carefully here, because it is the point at which people most want a reassuring general statement and a general statement would be wrong.
What the bank undertakes, and the extent of it, is set out in your agreement and in the framework the bank operates under. Read that rather than assuming, and ask the branch to explain it if the language is dense. Do not proceed on a belief formed from an advertisement or from something a relative said.
Cover for the contents themselves, where you want it, is ordinarily a separate arrangement you make yourself. Whether that is worth doing depends entirely on what is in there and on your own circumstances, and that is a financial decision rather than a documentary one — we are not insurance advisers and we will not tell you what to buy.
What we will say is the documentary half of it, because it is squarely our subject: any arrangement of that kind depends on being able to say what was there. Which brings you back to the inventory and the photographs, and makes them necessary rather than merely sensible.
Everything above has been leading here, and it takes twenty minutes to start.
One page. Item, brief description, identifying detail where there is one, the date it went in. Not a valuation — we are not valuers and you do not need one for this purpose. A description that lets somebody else recognise the thing.
Photographs. Each item, laid out plainly, with something for scale. Taken at home before the visit rather than in a strongroom.
Updated on each visit. Two lines added or struck through. The habit is the whole thing; a list made once and never touched again describes a locker that no longer exists.
Stored outside the locker, and this is the instruction people get wrong with perfect logic. A list kept inside is a list that cannot be reached at the exact moment somebody needs it — which is when the locker cannot be opened. Keep it with your personal papers, keep a copy somewhere else, and keep it where somebody you trust could find it.
Where you keep documents in a locker, a scanned copy held elsewhere is worth as much as the original for most practical purposes, and it costs an afternoon — our DigiLocker assistance service deals with the official digital side of that for the documents it covers.
And write down, on the same page, the bank, the branch and the locker number. It is astonishing how often a family knows a locker exists and cannot say where.
The same habit belongs at the other end of the relationship. Almost everything that makes a locker straightforward later — a nomination that exists, an address the bank can reach, a name that matches everything else you hold — is settled on the morning the underlying account is opened, in decisions taken in about thirty seconds each. Our account opening guide sets those out.
Lockers that nobody knew about are one of the commonest ways family property is simply lost, and the reason is structural: nothing arrives in the post to announce a locker. There is no statement, no annual letter, no reminder.
So tell at least one person you trust: which bank, which branch. You do not have to tell anybody what is inside, and if that is the reason you have not mentioned it, separate the two — the existence and the contents are different pieces of information.
Better still, put it on the same page as everything else: a single sheet listing your accounts, your policies, your investments and your locker, kept where the family can find it. That page is worth more to the people who come after you than almost anything else you could leave them, and it takes an evening.
Our insurance death claim guide makes the same argument about policies, for the same reason: the hardest part of that whole subject is finding out what existed.
We offer no view on what anybody should own or what is worth keeping, and this is not that kind of advice. It is a documentary point.
A locker suits things that are irreplaceable and rarely needed. That combination is what makes the inconvenience worth it.
It suits badly anything you may need at short notice or outside banking hours. People discover this at the worst times — a document wanted on a Sunday, a paper needed at a registration appointment, something required by a hospital admission desk. Think about when you would need each thing before it goes in.
For documents, keep a scanned copy outside. The original may live in the locker; the copy solves ninety per cent of the occasions on which you would otherwise have to go and get it.
Do not put in the only copy of anything somebody else may need in an emergency — and in particular, do not keep the sole copy of a will in a locker that will not be opened until the will’s own directions are needed. That circularity is a real and recurring problem, and our will drafting guide deals with where a will should actually be kept.
A real requirement — illness, travel, age, distance — and one that people solve informally, which is where it goes wrong.
Handing your key to somebody is not an arrangement. The bank’s key is still required, and the bank deals with who may operate a locker under its own requirements. A relative holding a key has, in practice, a piece of metal and no authority.
So ask the branch, in advance and in writing, what it requires in order for somebody else to operate the locker, and put whatever that is in place properly. Banks are careful about this for obvious reasons, and a properly made arrangement is accepted where an improvised one is refused at the counter with somebody standing there.
Where a formal authority document is needed, our notary affidavit service prepares declarations and our power of attorney guide explains how authority documents are structured and what makes one usable. What we will not do is draft an authority wider than the task, and you should not want one: an authority to operate a locker is a specific thing.
And revisit it. An authority given for a six-month absence should end when the absence does, and the step of cancelling it is the one nobody takes.
Done at the branch, on its forms, with both the existing and the incoming parties involved. It is straightforward and it is worth doing consciously rather than as a convenience.
Three things to settle before you do it. What operating instruction will apply afterwards — adding a person and leaving the instruction as it was is how people accidentally create a locker that now requires two signatures for every visit, or one that can be opened by somebody alone when that was not intended.
What the nomination should say afterwards, because adding a hirer changes the picture and the nomination does not update itself.
What everybody understands this to mean. Adding an adult child as a hirer for practical access is entirely sensible. Being clear within the family that it is for access and not a statement about ownership is what prevents it being read differently later.
Removing a hirer is the same exercise in reverse, and it is the one that gets left undone after a separation, an estrangement or a move. It is a form and a visit.
Dull, and the thing that decides whether you hear about anything.
Notices reach the address and the contact details the bank holds. An address from a previous house, a mobile number changed three years ago, an email nobody reads — each of those turns a notified person into an unnotified one, and the bank’s record will show that notice was sent.
So update them, at the branch, in writing, and get an acknowledgement. Do it for the account and the locker together, and ask specifically whether updating one updates the other — the answer is not always what you would expect, and asking costs a sentence.
The same applies to periodic verification requirements that banks are obliged to carry out. Responding when asked is easier than being chased, and unattended requests are a common route to an arrangement being restricted. Our bank KYC update assistance service deals with that side of it.
And where your name itself has changed, deal with it across records rather than in one place — our name change guide sets out the order to do that in, and a locker agreement in a former name is exactly the kind of thing that is remembered last.
And one warning that belongs with keeping particulars current, because it has become the commonest way people lose money to strangers: a great deal of fraud now dresses itself as a routine verification request, precisely because it is a request everybody is half-expecting. No bank ever needs a code, a PIN or a password from you. Our bank KYC guide sets out how to tell a genuine request from a fake and what to do in the first hour if you have already answered one.
Branches close, merge and relocate, and lockers move with them. It is an ordinary event and it is a moment when records get out of step.
What to do is one letter. Ask, in writing, what is happening to your locker, where it is moving, when, and what you are required to do. Attend if asked. Then get written confirmation of the new arrangement, including the new branch and the new locker particulars.
Then update your own page — the one with the bank, branch and locker number on it — because the whole point of that page is that it is accurate.
Where the move is one you are initiating, ask what the surrender-and-rehire looks like and whether the nomination travels or has to be made afresh. Do not assume it travels.
Ending an arrangement is a documented act, and treating it as simply stopping is how people find years later that it never ended.
Four steps. Empty it, checking against your own list so that nothing is left behind. Hand back the keys and get that recorded. Obtain a written acknowledgement that the locker stands surrendered and that nothing further is due. Cancel the standing instruction for the rent, which is the step that gets forgotten and the one that produces small recurring debits nobody can explain.
Keep that acknowledgement with your papers. It is a one-page document that closes a relationship, and it is the only thing that will answer a question about it later.
And while you are ending one arrangement, look at the others in the same family of records: accounts you no longer use, instructions still running, nominations pointing at people you would no longer choose. A surrender visit is a good day to tidy all of it.
Dealt with briefly here because it is a subject of its own and it is covered properly elsewhere.
The locker is opened under the bank’s own procedure, which involves an inventory taken in the presence of witnesses and rules about who may be present. It is scheduled rather than done on demand. The route depends on whether there is a surviving joint hirer, a nomination on the locker itself, or neither — and, as this page has laboured, the locker’s nomination is not the account’s.
Our deceased depositor guide sets out the whole sequence in the bank, and our bank locker claim documentation service deals with the locker exercise specifically. Where heirship has to be established, our legal heir certificate, succession certificate and probate of will services apply, and which of those is the right instrument is a question for an advocate.
The single thing that helps a family most at that moment is the thing this page has been asking for throughout: a page saying the locker exists, where it is, and what was in it.
And the reason all of the above is worth an evening: when a locker is eventually opened after a death, the list written that morning becomes the only record of its contents that will ever exist anywhere. Everything you did in advance — the nomination, the inventory, telling somebody it exists — is what decides whether that morning is straightforward. Our locker claim guide sets out that day in detail.
Put it in writing. That is the whole of the first step, and it is the step that converts a conversation into a matter somebody has to answer.
Write to the branch with the facts and the dates, keep a copy, and ask for a written response. If that does not resolve it, the bank’s own grievance route exists for exactly this and costs nothing — our banking complaint guide sets out how that ladder works and how to write something that gets a specific answer rather than a general one, and our RBI complaint assistance service deals with the rung above the bank.
What helps enormously at that point is material you should already have: the agreement, the nomination acknowledgement, your access notes, your inventory and your correspondence. A hirer holding those is in an entirely different position from one holding a recollection.
And where a matter genuinely goes beyond all of that, court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly; we do not quote, collect or share it. Our find an advocate page is where to start.
Two different situations, both handled by banks under their own requirements, and both worth asking about rather than assuming.
A child as nominee. Ordinarily an adult is named alongside to act on the child’s behalf. That adult is the detail nobody revisits, and it is frequently the detail that has aged worst — a person chosen fifteen years ago for a situation that no longer resembles the present one.
A locker involving a minor in any other capacity. Ask the branch what it requires. Do not construct an arrangement and hope it is acceptable.
And the broader point, which applies to every nomination anybody makes: a nomination naming a child should be looked at when the child stops being one. It is a form and a visit, and it is the single most commonly missed review in this whole subject.
It happens, usually because terms have been revised, and it is ordinarily unremarkable.
Two things. Read the new one rather than signing it as a formality, particularly the parts about operation, rent and what the bank undertakes. And ask for a copy, then replace the old one in your file rather than keeping both and later being unsure which governs.
Then take the opportunity, because it is handed to you: while you are sitting at that desk, check the nomination. You are already there, the officer is already dealing with your locker, and it is the one occasion when the errand costs nothing extra. It is also, in our experience, the single most productive five minutes available to anybody who holds a locker.
Not dramatic, all ordinary, and every one avoidable in an afternoon.
Assuming one nomination covers everything. The account was thought about; the locker was not.
No list. Nobody else knows, nothing is recorded, and memory is doing work it cannot do.
The list kept in the locker. Logical, and useless precisely when needed.
The standing instruction that quietly failed. Nobody refused to pay; an account changed.
Nobody else knew it existed. No statement arrives to announce a locker, so if you do not say it, it is not said.
Never surrendered properly. Emptied and abandoned rather than closed in writing, and still technically running years later.
Small work, honestly described, because the whole value of it is that it is small now instead of large later.
We go through the agreement with you before you sign, in plain language, and tell you what it actually commits you to — particularly on operation, on rent, and on the circumstances in which the bank may open the locker.
We prepare the nomination, make sure it is the nomination you actually intend, and get the acknowledgement rather than assuming it was recorded. Then we do the check almost nobody does: whether the locker nomination, the account nomination and your will are telling the same story, and where they are not, what to change.
We set up the inventory and the private record properly — the page, the photographs, where it lives, who else knows — and we write it in a form somebody else could use.
And we handle the changes when they come: adding or removing a hirer, a change of nominee, a fresh agreement, a branch move, a surrender done in writing with an acknowledgement at the end of it.
We do not value anything, and we do not advise on what to keep. What is worth putting in a locker is your judgement about your own property, and an opinion from us on it would be worth nothing.
We do not advise on insurance. Whether to cover the contents, and with what, is a financial decision requiring a licence we do not hold. We will tell you the documentary part — that any such arrangement rests on being able to say what was there.
We do not decide who is entitled to anything. A nomination is about access; ownership follows succession and any will, and that is advice rather than documentation. Court work is for your advocate, whose fee is engaged and paid by you directly; we do not quote, collect or share it.
We are not present when a locker is opened, and we do not take part in anything to do with its contents. We prepare documents.
We do not prepare an authority wider than the task. If somebody needs to operate a locker, that is what the document should say, and no more.
Nothing is signed or filed in anybody’s name but their own, and you read every form before it goes in.
Our fee for this work starts at ₹999, the usual span is 1 – 5 days, we tell you the total before we start, and nothing is payable in advance. Most of that span is the bank’s own processing and the visit you make yourself; the documentation is a short exercise.
It is, by some distance, the least expensive thing on our list, and that is the right way round. Nothing here is complicated. The reason it is worth paying anybody for is not difficulty — it is that these are errands that never reach the top of anyone’s list, because nothing bad is happening and nothing is due.
What it prevents is not small. A locker with no nomination, opened months late, by a family who could not say what should have been inside. A rent instruction that failed in a year nobody remembers. An arrangement in a former name. A list that was written and then kept in the only place nobody could reach.
And the honest note, which this page has earned the right to make: you can do every single thing described here yourself, in one visit and one evening, for nothing. The agreement is yours to read, the nomination form is free, the list costs a sheet of paper and the photographs cost nothing at all. If you do only that and never call us, this page has done its job.
We read the locker agreement with you before you sign it and say plainly what it commits you to, prepare the nomination and obtain the acknowledgement instead of assuming it was recorded, check whether the locker nomination, the account nomination and your will agree with each other, set up an inventory and photographs in a form somebody else could actually use, and handle the changes when they come — a hirer added or removed, a nominee changed, a branch move, or a surrender closed in writing.
Two doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates