Nearly everybody thinks of this document as a card, because that is the part you can hold. It is the wrong way round, and getting it the right way round explains most of what follows. The record is an entry on a list, maintained for the place you live, describing one person by name, a relative’s name, an age or date of birth, an address and a photograph. The card is a token issued because that entry exists. Which means a lost card is a small matter and a wrong entry is a large one, even while the card in your pocket looks perfectly correct — and it means the first thing to do is never to examine the card. It is to look up the entry and read it field by field, because the two can differ and frequently do. Once you do that, a second thing becomes clear: four quite different problems look identical from outside, and people routinely start the wrong one. Something on your entry is wrong. There is no entry at all. Your entry is still standing in a place you left three years ago. Or there is more than one entry, or an entry that is not yours. Four situations, four applications, and naming yours correctly is worth more than any amount of effort spent on the wrong one. And one practical reason to care even if you have no interest in voting: this entry is read as identification and as proof of address, by employers, institutions and anybody verifying you. A wrong entry therefore costs you in places that have nothing to do with an election, and it costs you at the moment somebody is comparing one of your documents against another.
Worth establishing first, because every later decision follows from it.
A roll is maintained for a place. It lists the people entitled to be on it there, with enough detail to tell one from another. That list is the record. When an office, an employer or a verifier consults this, they are consulting the list, not your pocket.
The card is issued because the entry exists. It reproduces some of the entry at the moment it was printed, which is why an old card and a current entry can disagree without either being a forgery.
Two consequences worth carrying. A lost card is an inconvenience, not a loss of anything, and it is replaced on an ordinary application. And a perfect-looking card proves nothing about the entry behind it, which is why checking the card is not checking anything.
So whenever anybody in this subject says “my voter ID is wrong”, the useful reply is a question: wrong on the card, or wrong on the roll? Those are different problems with different fixes, and sometimes the answer is both.
Five minutes, done once, and it replaces most of the guesswork people do about this subject.
Look up the entry for the place you live — not the card — and take each field in turn, comparing it against your other documents rather than against your memory.
The name. The exact spelling, including initials, the order of parts, and any title or suffix.
The relative’s name. Which relative it records and how that name is spelt.
The age or date of birth, as it appears.
The address, in full, including the parts people ignore.
The photograph — whether it is recognisably you and whether it is recent enough to be useful.
Write down every difference you find, however small, before deciding anything. A list of differences is what turns a vague dissatisfaction into an application, and it also tells you whether the problem is one field or several.
The most useful distinction on this page and the one that saves the most wasted effort.
One: the entry exists and something on it is wrong. A spelling, a date, a relative’s name, a photograph, or an address within the same area. This is a correction.
Two: there is no entry at all. Nothing to correct — this is an application to be included, and it is a different exercise with different supporting material.
Three: the entry is in a place you have left. Not wrong, exactly; just no longer where you are. That is a transfer question rather than a correction, and it is where people most often start the wrong application.
Four: there is more than one entry, or an entry that is not yours. The rarest and the one to deal with most promptly.
Two of these are frequently combined in real life — somebody has moved and also has a misspelt name — and that is fine, provided you know you are doing two things rather than one, and that they may not move at the same speed.
The question people answer backwards, and answering it backwards doubles the work.
The instinct on finding a difference is to correct whichever document is in front of you. But if your name is spelt one way here and another way on most of your other records, it does not follow that this is the record that is wrong.
So settle that first, with four questions. Which spelling sits on your oldest paper? Which appears most often across the set? Which do you write yourself? And which is carried by the records that would be hardest to amend?
Amend whichever one is genuinely out of line, not whichever one is easiest to reach. That whole exercise is set out in our name mismatch guide. A name that has actually changed is a separate matter, with a chain of records that all have to catch up, and our name change guide covers that instead.
The mistake to avoid is a third version. Somebody who corrects the roll to match one document, having not noticed that three others say something else, has made their own life harder in a way that surfaces years later.
A point that sounds obvious and quietly governs three of the four problems on this page.
Rolls are kept place by place. You belong on the one for where you ordinarily live, and that single fact settles a great deal: which office deals with your record, where an application goes, and whether a move is an amendment or a relocation of the whole entry.
What confuses people is that “where you live” is a factual question rather than a preference. It is not decided by where a family home is, where your post goes, or where it would be more convenient to be listed.
Which matters most for people whose lives are split — students, people working in one city with family in another, anybody in temporary accommodation. The honest position for such a person is to be listed where they ordinarily live, and to deal with the entry left behind rather than keeping both.
So before any application, answer that question out loud: which place is this record supposed to belong to? Everything after it follows, and getting it wrong is how somebody ends up with two entries and no clear answer to give about either.
Nobody can change a record because you say it is wrong. Somebody has to be satisfied, from material independent of you, that the position you assert is the correct one.
Which changes where the effort goes. The form is the easy part. Assembling evidence that actually supports the specific field being corrected is the work, and it is what decides whether the application moves.
Two rules decide how much a document counts for. Age beats recency — a paper written near the time outranks one printed last year. And independence beats convenience — anything that traces back to the very record you are disputing adds nothing at all.
Which is why three recent documents that all copied each other prove very little, and one old one proves a great deal.
Attach what supports the field, and leave out the rest. A bundle of everything you own is slower to read and no more convincing — our application drafting guide covers assembling one properly, and it applies directly here.
The most commonly corrected field and the one with the most variations.
The usual patterns: a spelling that was written down phonetically by somebody who heard it rather than read it; an initial expanded or contracted; the parts of a name in a different order; a surname adopted or dropped after a marriage in some records and not others; and a transliteration between scripts that produced a different result here from elsewhere.
None of these is unusual and all of them are correctable. What differs is the evidence. A misspelling is corrected by documents showing the correct spelling. A name that genuinely changed is a different application, supported by whatever recorded the change.
Where two forms of your name genuinely have to coexist, our one & same person affidavit service prepares the declaration that ties them together, and our name change affidavit service the one that records a change.
One habit worth adopting whatever you do: decide which form of your name is the official one and use exactly that, everywhere, from now on. A great deal of this problem is created by people writing their own name three ways.
Treated as a formality and doing real work.
In an area with many people sharing a name, this field is frequently what distinguishes one entry from another. An error in it makes your entry harder to locate, easier to confuse with somebody else’s, and weaker when it is produced as identification.
The usual errors are ordinary: a spelling, an initial, or the wrong relative recorded — which happens more often than people expect, particularly on entries made long ago or made by somebody else on your behalf.
Correct it with a document showing the relationship and the correct name. And check the corresponding field on your other records at the same time, because a mismatch in this field across documents causes exactly the same trouble as a mismatch in your own name.
Where a relative’s name has itself changed, deal with that as its own matter rather than as an adjustment to your entry.
Given its own heading for two reasons: the rule that governs it surprises almost everybody, and getting it wrong here spreads outwards into every other record you hold.
Dates are decided by paper, and the paper that decides is the first one to record the date. Everything produced afterwards tends to have copied it, so half a dozen recent documents are not half a dozen proofs — they are one proof, reprinted six times.
So the exercise begins by finding the oldest record you have, which is frequently a school or birth record rather than anything in your wallet. Our birth certificate service obtains an issued copy where the original cannot be found.
Where a declaration is required alongside, our date of birth affidavit service prepares it.
And the caution that goes with every such change: put it right here alone and you have simply moved the disagreement somewhere else. Once you start, plan on doing the whole set, and budget for it as a project rather than a morning.
Not simply where letters go. On this record the address does something it does not do elsewhere: it decides which list you belong on.
Which is why a change of address is treated differently depending on how far you moved. Within the same area, it is an amendment to your entry. To a different area, your entry belongs somewhere else, and that is a different application.
People conflate the two constantly, apply for a correction when they needed a transfer, and lose weeks discovering it.
So establish first whether your new home falls within the same area as your old one, ask plainly rather than assuming, and then make the right application.
And where the address on the entry is simply recorded badly — an incomplete address, a wrong number, a locality spelt unrecognisably — that is an ordinary correction and worth doing, because an entry nobody can locate is an entry that fails when it is checked.
Extremely common and not an obstacle, though people treat it as one and give up.
Tenants, young adults living with family, people living in employer-provided accommodation, and people who have recently moved frequently have nothing at all in their own name for the new address.
Recognised alternatives exist for exactly this situation. What they are differs, so ask the office what it accepts for somebody in your position rather than assembling against a general idea of what a proof of address is.
If a sworn declaration is among the routes they accept, that is what our address proof affidavit service exists for.
And while you are at it, fix the address on the other records that have quietly fallen behind. People move and update two things out of eight, and the remaining six surface one at a time over the following years.
Small, and worth dealing with rather than tolerating.
Two problems occur. A photograph that is unrecognisable — too dark, too old, poorly reproduced — which weakens the entry every time it is produced as identification. And a photograph that belongs to somebody else, which is a problem for two people and should be raised at once.
Both are correctable on an ordinary application with a fresh photograph meeting whatever specification the office uses. Ask what that specification is rather than supplying whatever you have, because a rejected photograph sends the whole application back.
It is also worth updating a photograph that is simply very old. An entry whose image was taken twenty years ago does not fail, but it makes every verification slower than it needs to be.
A different exercise from correcting one, and it deserves saying plainly because people describe both as “my voter ID problem”.
Here nothing exists to amend. The application is to be included on the roll for the place you live, supported by evidence of who you are, where you live, and that you are eligible.
The situations where this arises are ordinary: somebody who never applied, somebody who has recently become eligible, somebody who moved and was removed from an old roll without being added anywhere, and somebody who has lived abroad for a long period.
The practical advice is the same as everywhere else in this subject. Ask what is required for your situation, assemble it before applying rather than during, and keep the acknowledgement.
And do not assume that eligibility produces enrolment. Being entitled to be on a list and being on it are two different facts, and only one of them happens by itself.
The most widespread untidiness in this subject, and almost nobody deals with it at the time.
You move city or area. A new entry is eventually made where you now live, or it is not. Either way, the old entry generally does not remove itself, and an entry standing in a place you left is a loose end — it is a record describing somebody who does not live there.
So treat a move as producing two tasks rather than one. Getting on the list where you now live, and dealing with the entry where you used to. People do the first, forget the second, and are then surprised to find two entries in their name.
Do it on your own initiative and in writing, saying plainly which entry should stand. An owner who raises this themselves is in an entirely different position from one who has it raised about them.
And where the move was some years ago, it is still worth doing now. This is one of those records where delay makes the paperwork heavier rather than the problem smaller.
The largest group of people carrying an untidy entry, and almost none of them think of themselves as having a problem.
Somebody studies in one city and their family home is in another. Somebody is posted for three years and keeps a home behind. Somebody works away and returns for a fortnight a year. In each case there is a place where they actually live and a place they would instinctively name as theirs.
The instinct is to leave the entry where the family is, because it feels more permanent and because nobody has said otherwise. That is how entries drift out of date for a decade, and it is also how the same person ends up added somewhere new without anything being removed.
There is no clever answer here and there is a tidy one: be listed where you ordinarily live, and deal with the other entry rather than leaving it standing. If where you live changes again, do the same thing again.
The practical difficulty is usually proof of address, because people in this position rarely have anything in their own name at the place they actually live. That is an ordinary situation with recognised alternatives — ask, and see the section above on what to do when nothing is in your name.
And where you genuinely cannot resolve it this year, at least know the position rather than assuming. An entry you know about is manageable; one you have forgotten is the one that surprises you.
Usually the innocent consequence of the last section, and it should be dealt with promptly rather than left.
It arises when somebody is added at a new place while an older entry is still standing. Nobody did anything wrong; two records now describe the same person in two places.
What to do is straightforward. Raise it yourself, in writing, say which entry is the correct current one and which should not stand, and attach what shows where you actually live. Keep the acknowledgement.
Do not leave it on the basis that it harms nobody. A duplicate weakens the record when it is produced as identification, and it is the kind of thing that is much better resolved by the person it concerns, at a time of their choosing, than at a moment somebody else has raised it.
Where you are unsure whether a duplicate exists, checking is free. Look yourself up in both the old area and the new one.
Rarer, unsettling, and it has a records process rather than a personal one.
Two versions. Details that are not yours appear against your name — a wrong photograph, a wrong relative, an address you have never lived at. Or somebody unknown appears as living at your address.
In both cases the move is the same: raise it in writing, through the defined route, with your own documents attached, and keep a copy of everything you filed and received.
What not to do is attempt to resolve it informally with whoever is listed. This is a records question, it belongs to the office that maintains the record, and keeping it there protects you.
Where somebody has used your details to obtain a document elsewhere, that is a separate and more serious matter, and it should be reported promptly through the appropriate channel rather than dealt with as a correction.
A small piece of practical knowledge that can halve the wait.
A roll is not only amended on individual applications. It is also revised periodically, and during such an exercise the machinery for adding, correcting and removing entries is already running at scale.
Which means an application made during a revision frequently moves faster than the same application made at a quiet time, simply because the people and the process are engaged.
This page prints no dates, because they differ by place and change from year to year, and a stale date here would send somebody at the wrong time. Ask locally when the next revision is, and if it is close, prepare now and file then.
And if it is not close, do not wait for it. An application filed today is a file in the system; an application planned for four months’ time is nothing at all.
The mechanical part, and it is the same discipline as any application to any office.
Name the correction precisely. Which field, what it currently says, and what it should say. One sentence, unmistakable.
Quote every reference you have — the entry details, any earlier acknowledgement, any number printed on the card. This is the line that lets somebody find your record in seconds rather than searching.
List the attachments, numbered, in the order you mention them, matching the bundle.
File by a route that leaves you holding proof, and keep whatever that route produces.
Our application drafting guide sets all of that out in full, including why one application should carry one ask — which applies here as well, since correcting three fields and moving an entry at once frequently means the quick part waits for the slow one.
Brief, and it is the habit that prevents a particular kind of loss.
Attach copies. Carry the originals to be shown if sight of them is wanted, and take them home again. No ordinary application requires you to surrender a document you would find hard to replace.
Where a certification on the copies is asked for, find out which kind is accepted before paying for one — our certified true copy guide explains the four different things people call attestation and why they are not interchangeable.
Copy both sides of every page, including blank ones, and check that everything is legible as a stranger would read it. A returned file is almost never returned for a bad argument; it is returned for a dark photocopy.
Said plainly because it is the single most skipped step and the most expensive one to skip.
An application that cannot be shown to have been made is, in practical terms, one that was not made. Six months later, with nothing in hand, there is no reference to quote, no date to work from, and nothing to follow up.
So leave with something: a reference number written down in front of you, a stamped copy, a receipt, a printed confirmation. Whatever the route produces, take it and photograph it the same day.
Then put a date in your calendar for the first follow-up, chosen when you file rather than when you become frustrated. Short letters at a fixed rhythm work; long ones at random intervals do not.
The step that closes the loop, and the one people replace with waiting for a card.
When the correction is said to be done, look up the entry again yourself and read every field, not only the one you asked about. Corrections occasionally fix one thing and disturb another, and this is the moment to catch that.
If the entry is right, you are finished, whether or not a card has arrived. If a card arrives and the entry is still wrong, you are not finished, however convincing the card looks.
Where the correction has not been carried through, raise it while it is recent — quoting the acknowledgement and attaching what you filed. A gap between approval and the record is far easier to close in the same month than in the following year.
And once it is right, note the date somewhere. Knowing when a record was last verified is useful the next time somebody queries it.
Handled gently and briefly, because it is a small task inside a much larger one and it is easy to miss entirely.
A record does not update itself. An entry for somebody who has died will stand until the office is told, and telling them is an ordinary step that families discover late, usually because something else drew attention to it.
It belongs on the list of records to be dealt with alongside the others — the bank, the insurer, the utility connections, the municipal record. Doing them together, once, is far less work than encountering each one separately over two years.
What is needed is a written intimation with the certificate attached. Our certified true copy service deals with the copies where several offices each want one, and our deceased depositor guide sets out the wider set of records a family has to work through.
There is no urgency in the sense of a deadline, and there is a reason not to postpone it indefinitely: a stale entry is one more thing for somebody to query later, at a moment when the family would rather not be explaining anything.
Handled purely as a records matter, because that is what it is.
Entries can be objected to and entries can be proposed for removal, and the process for both is defined. If it happens, two things matter and neither is argument.
Ask for the reason in writing. A reason tells you what has to be answered; without one you are guessing, and people who guess file the wrong response.
Respond through the defined route, with documents, within whatever period applies — ask what that period is rather than assuming, and note it.
Keep everything, in date order: what was said, what you filed, what you received, and when. That file is your position, and it is either complete or it is not, which is decided long before anybody needs it.
If it does turn into a legal matter, the person you bring in for that is retained and paid by you, directly; our side of it stays the paperwork.
The practical reason, and it persuades more people than any other paragraph on this page.
This record is widely used as identification and as proof of address. Employers ask for it. Institutions accept it. Verifications rely on it. Which means the entry is being read by people who have nothing to do with elections.
So a wrong entry costs you where you did not expect it. A name spelt differently here from your other documents is one more mismatch in the set somebody is comparing, and it is one of the documents most likely to be produced casually and therefore most likely to be the one that does not match.
Our document verification service is that exercise from the other side, and the fields that fail a verification are almost always the ordinary ones: a spelling, a date, a relative’s name.
Which makes this a record worth keeping correct as part of the general set rather than as an election-time errand.
Common, particularly for older relatives, and there is a line worth respecting.
You can read the entry, work out what is wrong, assemble the documents and prepare the application. What may actually be signed or submitted by somebody other than the person concerned is decided by the office, so ask rather than assume.
Never sign in another person’s name. There is no version of this that is a shortcut; it is a defect built into the application.
Where somebody genuinely cannot attend or cannot sign, established ways of dealing with that exist and differ. Ask the office how it handles the situation and follow what it says.
And do the whole household at once while you are at it. Families discover that three entries have quietly gone out of date at the same time, for the same reason — a move nobody followed up on.
A good deal of this can now be done without going anywhere, and that is genuinely an improvement. Two cautions are worth stating.
Use the official route and nothing else. There are a great many pages and applications offering to do this on your behalf, and the ones worth avoiding look exactly like the ones worth using. Reach the official route directly rather than through a link somebody sent you.
Do not hand your documents to anybody who promises a result. Nobody can decide what an office will approve, and a fee taken in advance against a promised outcome is the oldest arrangement in this business. As everywhere else in this work, be wary of a fee before your papers have been looked at, a promise about the decision, and a request to keep your originals.
Where you do it yourself, keep the same discipline a prepared file would have: one correction stated clearly, evidence for that field, copies rather than originals, and the confirmation saved the day you get it.
And take your own screenshot or printout of what you submitted. An online submission that produced no record on your side is the same problem as a counter submission with no stamped copy — you have done something you cannot show.
The advice that turns a correction into something worth the afternoon.
Whatever difference you found here almost certainly exists somewhere else, because these records copy each other. So while you have the documents out, check the same fields across the rest of your set: identity records, bank records, employment records, educational documents, insurance.
Correct them in a deliberate order rather than at random, starting with the record the others will be checked against. Our name change guide sets out that sequence properly for a name, and the same logic applies to a date or an address.
And write down what you did and when. A one-page note of which records were corrected in which month is genuinely useful the next time something does not match, which for most people is about two years later.
Every one of them is avoidable before anything is filed.
The card was read instead of the entry, so the actual problem was never diagnosed.
The wrong one of the four applications was started, usually a correction where a transfer was needed.
The wrong record was corrected, creating a third version of a name or a date.
The documents did not support the specific field, so the file came back for material nobody had asked you for in advance.
No acknowledgement was kept, so there was nothing to follow up with.
The roll was never checked afterwards, and a correction that did not go through was discovered a year later by somebody else.
We start by reading the entry rather than the card, field by field, against the documents you already hold. That comparison is the diagnosis, and it frequently turns up something the person had not come to us about.
Then we name the application: a correction, an inclusion, a transfer, or dealing with a duplicate. Getting that right at the start is worth more than everything that follows, and it is where most of the wasted effort in this subject goes.
Then we work out which of your records is actually the odd one, so that a correction here does not create a mismatch somewhere else — and if the honest answer is that a different record should be corrected first, we say so even though it is more work.
Then the file: evidence that supports the specific field, copies rather than originals, an application that states one thing clearly, and a list of what is attached.
And afterwards we tell you what to check and when, because the entry is the record and nobody else is going to look at it for you.
No outcome is promised and no date either. Neither the decision nor the pace belongs to us, and any schedule quoted before an application exists would simply be made up.
We do not sign or submit in anybody else’s name, and we will not prepare an application on the basis that somebody else will.
We do not write anything that cannot be shown. A correction application is a statement about what the true position is, and it has to be one the documents support.
We give no advice on anything political, and this page carries none. Our subject is a record and how a person gets their own record right.
We do not keep your originals. They are produced, copied where needed, and returned in the same visit.
Our work begins at ₹1,200, the usual span for our part is 3 – 15 days, the whole figure is told to you before we start, and nothing is payable in advance. Doing several members of a household together is quicker per person and we price it that way.
What we cannot price is the office’s own pace, and we would rather say that plainly than offer a date we do not control.
What lengthens the work is almost always the same thing: a difference between records that has to be settled before this application can sensibly be made. That is worth doing first, even though it feels like a detour.
And the honest closing note, because nearly all of this is something you can do yourself: pull up the entry instead of the card. Go through every field. Decide which document is out of step before you apply. Send proof for that one field. Walk out with an acknowledgement. Look the entry up again when it is done. Six habits, an afternoon of your time, and they are most of what a well-run correction consists of.
Most of the time lost in this subject is spent on the wrong application, because four quite different problems look identical from outside. We read your actual entry field by field against the documents you hold, name which of the four you have, work out which of your records is genuinely the odd one so a correction here does not create a mismatch elsewhere, assemble evidence for the specific field rather than a bundle of everything, and prepare an application that states one thing clearly. Then we tell you exactly what to check afterwards, because the entry is the record and the card is only a token of it.
Two doors, both free. Clients search a factual directory of enrolled advocates. Advocates apply to be listed on it — no fee, no commission, nothing paid in either direction.
Search Bar Council enrolled advocates by what your matter is about, by court, or by city. Searching and sending a request are both free.
Enrolled advocates anywhere in India can apply to be listed. Your entry is published only after we verify your enrolment number with your State Bar Council.
This directory carries no ratings, no reviews, no rankings and no fees — only the factual particulars the Bar Council of India permits, published at each advocate's own request. Browse the network · Terms for Advocates